Haryana

Karnal

CC/316/2020

Sector-9, Residents Welfare Society - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Of Haryana - Opp.Party(s)

Sanjiv Kamboj

23 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

 Complaint No.316 of 2020

Date of instt. 24.08.2020

Date of Decision:23.11.2021

 

Sector-9, Residents Welfare Society (Regd.) having its office at Community Centre, Sector-9, Karnal through its President Sh. Som Pal Rana, resident of House No.866, Sector-9, Urban Estate,Karnal, aged about 52 years.

                                                                …….Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. State of Haryana through its Collector, Karnal.
  2. The Chief Administrator of Haryana Vikas Pradhikaran having its office at Sector-6, Panchkula.
  3. Haryana Vikas Pradhikaran through its Estate Officer, having its office at Sector-12, Karnal.
  4. Municipal Corporation, Karnal through its Commissioner, Karnal.
  5. Sanjay son of Prem Singh, resident of Village Chhapra Khera, district Karnal.

 

                                                                …..Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member

 

Present:  Complainant in person alongwith Sh. Sanjeev Kamboj.

                   Sh. Vijay Sahni, counsel for Op No.3.

                   Sh. B.P.Singh, counsel for Op No.4.

                   Sh. Balbir Chauhan, counsel for Op No.5.

                  

       Today the case was fixed for filing written version on behalf of Ops No.4 & 5 and for issuance of Ops No.1 & 2.  Written version on behalf of Op No.4 filed.  Copy supplied.

                At the stage, complainant suffered her separate statement to the effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same on technical defect and sought permission to file afresh on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction. 

                In view of statement of complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies thereof. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:23.11.2021             

 

                                                                                           President,     

District Consumer Disputes   

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)          

     Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.