Haryana

Rohtak

CC/21/216

Satya Parkash - Complainant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Satender Nara

07 Dec 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/216
( Date of Filing : 19 Mar 2021 )
 
1. Satya Parkash
Aged 55 years S/o Sh. Zile Singh R/o House No. 215, Sector 4, Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. State of Haryana
through Collector Rohtak.
2. Director, Urban Estate,
Haryana C-3 Sector 6 HUDA Complex. Panchkula.
3. Chief Administrator
HSVP, Rohtak.
4. Administrator HSVP
Rohtak
5. Estate officer,
HSVP Rohtak.
6. Land Acquisition officer,
Urban Estate Department, Opp. Jat Bhawan, HUDA, Sector-1, Rohtak.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sh. Satender Nara, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sh. M.K. Munjal, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
 Sh. Krishan Patwari, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 07 Dec 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 216.

                                                                        Instituted on     : 19.03.2021.  

                                                                        Decided on       :  7.12.2021.

 

Satya Parkash, aged 55 years son of Shri Zile Singh, resident of House No.215, Sector-4, Rohtak.

                                                                                    ………..Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. State of Haryana through Collector, Rothak.
  2. Director, Urban Estate, Haryana C-3 Sector-6, HUDA Complex, Panchkula.
  3. Chief Administrator, HSVP Panchkula.
  4. Administrator, HSVP, Rohtak.
  5. Estate Officer, HSVP, Rohtak.
  6. Land Acquisition Officer, Urban Estate Department, Opp. Jat Bhawan, HUDA, Sector-1, Rohtak.                                                                                                                                                                          ……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:          Sh. Satender Nara, Advocate complainant in person.

Sh. MK Munjal, Advocate for the opposite party no.3, 4 and 5.

Sh. Ashish Tehlan, ADA for opposite party no.1 and 2.

Sh. Sanjay Patwari, for opposite party no.6.

 

                        Ld. Counsel for the complainant made a statement on dated 2.12.2021 that he does not want to pursue the present complaint and withdraws the same.

            In view of the made by ld. Counsel for the complainant on dated 2.12.2021, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                                    File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 7.12.2021.

 

 

Member                                                                                 President

                                                                                                DCDRC, Rohtak

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.