Haryana

Karnal

CC/472/2022

Paramjeet - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Of Haryana - Opp.Party(s)

Nidhi Rani

19 Jul 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.472 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.16.08.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:19.07.2024

 

Paramjeet son of Shri Ram Kumar, resident of Village Pabana Hassanpur, Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal aged 42 years.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1.     State of Haryana through Collector, Karnal.

2.     Director, Animal Husbandary and Diary Department, Bays 9 to 12, Sector-2, Panchkula.

3.     Deputy Director, ICDP Village Uchani, District Karnal.

                                                                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Mrs.Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

 

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                OP No.1 ex-parte vide order dated 28.10.2022

                Shri Hukam Chand, on behalf of OPs No.2 & 3.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to third last opportunities. No evidence is present. None has put in appearance on behalf of complainant. The position remained the same on the adjourned date. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:50 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 05.05.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission and would cause harassment to the OPs. The present complaint pertains to the year 2022.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:19.07.2024.            

               President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)       (Saravjeet Kaur) 

    Member                     Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.