Haryana

Rohtak

CC/20/410

Manju Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Of Haryana - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Dharam Vir Sharma

15 Mar 2022

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/410
( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Manju Devi
W/o Raj Singh Hooda R/o H.No. 1599, Sector-2, Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. State Of Haryana
Chief Administrator HSVP, Sector-6, Panchkula.
2. Administrator
HSVP, Sector-14, Gurugram.
3. State of Haryana
Through Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak (Haryana).
4. Estate Officer II
HSVP, Sector-34, Gurugram.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
  Dr. Shyam Lal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 410.

                                                                        Instituted on     : 25.09.2020   

                                                                        Decided on       :  15.03.2022.

 

Manju Devi W/o Raj Singh Hooda, R/o House No. 1599, Sector-2, Rohtak

 

                                                                                    ………..Complainant.

                                                Vs.

 

  1. State of Haryana through Chief Administrator, HSVP, Sector-6, Panchkula.
  2. Administrator, HSVP, Sector-14, Gurugram.
  3. Deputy Commissioner, Gurugram.
  4. Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Sector-34, Gurugram.

……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:          Shri Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.

                        Shri KK Lutra, Advocate for the OPs No. 1,2 and 4.

                        Shri Ashish Tehlan, ADA for the OP No. 3.

 

Sh. Ashish Tehlan, ADA made a statement that the reply already filed by OP No. 1, 2 and 4 be also read on behalf of the OP No. 3.    

Ld. Counsel for the complainant made a statement that he does not want to pursue the present complaint and withdraws the same.

            In view of the statement made by ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                                    File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 15.03.2022

 

 

Member                                 Member                                 President

                                                                                                DCDRC, Rohtak

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Dr. Shyam Lal]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.