BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AT HYDERABAD.
C. C. 83/2009
Between:
1. Dr. M. Rajasekhar, S/o. Late M. Adinarayana
Retd. Dy. Civil Surgeon, Age: 62 years
Flat No. 2, Venkata Sai Nest
H.No. 8-3-945/A/12 & 13
Nagarjunanagar, Ameerpet
Hyderabad.
2. Smt. K. Srivani, W/o. M. Satish Babu
Age: 32 years, House Wife,
Rep. by GPA Dr. M. Rajasekhar
3. M. Sri Sarayu, D/o. M. Satish Babu
Minor Rep. by GPA Dr. M. Rajasekhar
4. M. Saketh, S/o. M. Satish Babu
Minor Rep. by GPA Dr. M. Rajasekhar
R/o. Flat No. 2, Venkata Sai Nest
H.No. 8-3-945/A/12 & 13
Nagarjuna Nagar, Ameerpet
Hyderabad. *** Complainants
And
1) The Chief Post Master General
A.P. Circle, Abids, Hyderabad.
2) The Director, Postal Department
Rayalseema Zone, Kurnool
3) The District Postal Superintendent
Kadapa, Kadapa District.
4) The Post Master, Head Post Office
Kadapa.
5) The Dist. Collector,
Kadapa District, Kadapa
6) G. Malleswara Rao, Age: 45 years
D.No. 5/288, Fort Street
Kadapa
7) B. Kanaka Satya, Age: 40 years
W/o. G. Malleswara Rao
D.No. 5/288, Fort Street
Kadapa *** Opposite Parties
Counsel for the complainants : M/s. G. Venkatesh
Counsel for the opposite Parties: Mr. V. Vinod Kumar (R1 to R4)
Govt. Pleader (R5)
CORAM:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, PRESIDENT
&
SMT. M. SHREESHA, MEMBER
WEDNESDAY, THIS THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND TEN
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
*****
1) This is a complaint filed against postal department and the Dist. Collector for refund of Rs. 14 lakhs being the value of investments made by the complainants, besides Rs. 1,40,000/- towards bonus, Rs. 10 lakhs towards damages and costs.
2) The case of the complainants through their GPA in brief is that complainant No. 1 is the father-in-law of complainant No. 2 and grand father of complainant Nos. 3 & 4 and he as their GPA holder filed the complaint they being residents of USA. He being a retired Deputy Civil Surgeon intended the retirement benefits of Rs. 14 lakhs invested in Monthly Income Scheme (MIS) and Recurring Deposit (R.D) with the Post Master, HPO, Kadapa (OP4) as under:
STATEMENT OF M.I.S. ACCOUNT |
S.No. | Name | MIS A/c | Rs. | A/c No. | Maturity date |
| | Opened on | | | |
| | | | | |
1 | K. Srivani | 28.02.2003 | 6,00,000/- | 106286 | 28.02.2009 |
2 | Dr. M. Rajasekhar | 02.01.2006 | 2,00,000/- | 112431 | 02.01.2012 |
3 | M. Sri Sarayu | 02.01.2006 | 3,00,000/- | 112430 | 02.01.2012 |
4 | M. Saketh | 02.01.2006 | 3,00,000/- | 112429 | 02.01.2012 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
STATEMENT OF R.D. ACCOUNT |
S.No. | Name | R.D. A/c | Monthly | A/c No. | Maturity date |
| | Opened on | instalment | | |
| | | from MIS to RD | | |
| | | | | |
1 | K. Srivani | 28.02.2003 | 4,500/- | 16346 | 28.02.2008 |
| | | | Extended up to 28.02.2009 |
| | | | | |
2 | Dr. M. Rajasekhar | 04.01.2006 | 1,350/- | 19771 | 04.01.2011 |
3 | M. Sri Sarayu | 02.01.2006 | 2,000/- | 19764 | 02.01.2011 |
4 | M. Saketh | 02.01.2006 | 2,000/- | 19763 | 02.01.2011 |
| | | | | |
Out of MIS, an amount of Rs. 4,500/- was being regularly deposited in R.D. account. Ops 6 & 7 used to submit ASLAS forms evidencing the above said deposits. The amounts were paid till March, 2009. When MIS was matured on 28.2.2009 and when he intended to withdraw the same Ops 6 & 7 convinced him by renewing the MIS he would get same interest and he would be benefited, believing their version he gave consent for renewal and waiting for return of pass books. However they failed to deliver the pass books. Thereupon he approached Op4 and found that MIS accounts were prematurely closed on 6.3.2007 and an amount of Rs. 6 lakhs was withdrawn on the said date. Since the entries in R.D. accounts have been updated till 26.3.2009 he never suspected the agents. When he got doubt he immediately verified the accounts and found that an amount of Rs. 14 lakhs in MIS accounts were withdrawn prematurely on 11.2.2007, 14.5.2007, and 2.5.2008 while the R.D. books were got up dated up to 26.3.2009. He found that Ops 6 & 7 forged the signatures of the second complainant and submitted for premature payment and the postmaster paid the same without insisting on personal appearance, account books and withdrawal forms in proper format. The payments made to the agents were contrary to law and the rules framed by the department. They ought to have paid by way of cheque only. When he got issued notice the post office by its letter dt. 21.5.2009 gave an evasive and vague reply stating that MIS was closed and the pass books would not be preserved. There was collusion and fraud between the authorities manning the post office and the agents. They have to follow the norms contemplated under the banking business governed by RBI guidelines, and Income Tax regulations etc. The Government of A.P. and OP1 who is in-charge of entire operations of the State with regard to National Small Savings were liable to compensate. They were entitled to bonus of Rs. 1,40,000/- on MIS. On a complaint issued by him the police registered a case in Crime No. 98/2009. Opposite Parties 1 to 3 are vicariously liable.
The signature of Smt. K. Srivani was forged evident to the naked eye. He also filed a private complaint in CCSR No. 253/2009 before the First Additional Junior First Class Magistrate, Kadapa who forwarded the same to the police for investigation. They registered as a crime u/s 409, 420, 424 of IPC against Post Master, HPO, Kadapa (Op4), G. Malleswara Rao (Op6) and B. Kanaka Satya (Op7). The remand diary discloses that they had confessed that they had committed the offence with the co-operation and connivance of postal employees. The complainant was put to untold tension and agony. Ops 6 & 7 who were highly indebted, in order to avoid decree that may be passed against them high handedly transferred the property in favour of their daughter vide gift deed dt. 18.5.2009. He alleged that several irregularities were conducted. It amounts to deficiency in service, negligence and unfair trade practice. Therefore they claimed Rs. 14 lakhs being the value of investments, besides Rs. 1.40 lakhs towards bonus together with Rs. 10 lakhs towards damages and costs.
3) Opposite Parties 1 to 4 postal department resisted the case. While denying each and every allegation made in the complaint they alleged that the Commission had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as plea of forgery, fraud, mis-representation etc. besides criminal breach of trust were taken, which involves leading elaborate evidence, cross-examination and enquiry by a competent court. When the police had filed a charge sheet against Ops 6 & 7 agents necessarily elaborate enquiry had to be made. The very premise on which the complaint was filed was their MIS accounts were closed by the agents without their knowledge by forging their signatures on the withdrawal forms and the post office had paid the same without their personal appearance and in the absence of pass books and withdrawal forms in a proper format. So also they complained that cash payments were made to the agents contrary to the procedure. The details of accounts and their closure are as follows:
S.No. | MIS A/c No. | Interest drawn on | Rs. | RD A/c No. | Date of | Rs. | Penalty Fee |
| | | | | Deposit | | |
| | | | | | | |
1 | 106286 | 28.08.2006 | 4500 | 16346 | 31.08.2006 | 4500 | |
| | | | | 21.09.2006 | 4500 | |
| | 26.10.2006 | 4500 | | 30.10.2006 | 4500 | |
| | 27.11.2006 | 4500 | | 18.11.2006 | 4500 | |
| | 27.12.2006 | 4500 | | 28.12.2006 | 4500 | |
| | 31.01.2007 | 4500 | | Not deposited | --- | |
| | 28.02.2007 | 4500 | | 21.02.2007 | 9000 | |
| | | | | | | |
2 | 112431 | 17.08.2006 | 1333 | 19771 | 31.08.2006 | 1350 | |
| | 11.09.2006 | 1333 | | 21.09.2006 | 1350 | |
| | 12.10.2006 | 1333 | | 31.10.2006 | 1350 | |
| | 09.11.2006 | 1333 | | 18.11.2006 | 1350 | |
| | 12.12.2006 | 1333 | | 28.12.2006 | 1350 | |
| | 03.01.2007 | 1333 | | Not deposited | --- | |
| | 06.02.2007 | 1333 | | 24.02.2007 | 1350 | |
| | | | | | | |
3 | 112430 | 17.08.2006 | 2000 | 19764 | 31.08.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 11.09.2006 | 2000 | | 21.09.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 12.10.2006 | 2000 | | 31.10.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 07.11.2006 | 2000 | | 18.11.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 07.12.2006 | 2000 | | 28.12.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 04.01.2007 | 2000 | | Not deposited | --- | |
| | 05.02.2007 | 2000 | | 21.02.2007 | 2000 | 40 |
| | | | | | | |
4 | 112429 | 17.08.2006 | 2000 | 19763 | 31.08.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 11.09.2006 | 2000 | | 21.09.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 12.10.2006 | 2000 | | 31.10.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 07.11.2006 | 2000 | | 18.11.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 07.12.2006 | 2000 | | 28.12.2006 | 2000 | |
| | 04.01.2007 | 2000 | | Not deposited | --- | |
| | 05.02.2007 | 2000 | | 21.02.2007 | 2000 | 40 |
| | | | | | | |
The record discloses that the staff worked at Kadapa, HPO observed the prescribed procedure for closure of above accounts. On presentation of withdrawal forms for closure of accounts along with pass books by the depositors and having satisfied with the signatures of the depositors MIS accounts were closed according to the prescribed procedure. Though the rules stipulate payment of amounts exceeding Rs. 20,000/- by way of cheque, keeping the request of the depositors in view and as it is customary to pay matured amount in the form of cash they have paid accordingly. At the most for latches on the part of officials it would entail departmental action. However, on this ground the accountholders would not again receive the cash. The account holders had appended their signatures on SB-7 as a token of receipt of money. An amount of Rs. 2,94,000/- was realized on account of closure of MIS a/c No. 112429 and the same was deposited in S.B. a/c No. 430438 on 14.5.2007, and the amount was withdrawn by the depositor on the same day. Due to non-availability of SB-7 (a) form for closure of MIS accounts form SB-7 was used to close the account. Ops 6 & 7 SAS agents were appointed by the Dist. Collector, Kadapa and attached to Kadapa Head Office to carry out small savings business. They were not under their control. The money transactions carried out by the post offices were subject to instructions issued by Ministry of Finance and not under the control of RBI. To promote the small savings among the public certain money transactions like savings bank/RD/MIS, sale of certificates etc. have been entertained as a subsidiary work. R.D. a/c No. 16346 was opened by Smt. K. Srivani (complainant No. 2) and Sri M. Satish Babu her husband on 27.2.2003 and not on 28.2.2003 as stated by the complainants. The amounts derived from MIS accounts were regularly deposited in R.D. accounts but not on appointed dates which is evident from the transactions. The income arrived from MIS a/c No. 112431 of first complainant was Rs. 1,333/- but he opened R.D. a/c No. 19771 with monthly denomination of Rs. 1,350/-. They were not in automatic transfer method. Had such method has been availed without the intervention of agents the interest amounts arrived from MIS would be automatically transferred to their S.B. accounts and then to R.D. account. The dates of MIS interests drawn and dates of R.D. deposits were different. Op6 was SAS agent not authorised to attend the monthly transactions of the complainants. Op7 only was authorised to do so. She used to submit ASLAS form in the post office along with cash of R.D. deposits and the post office affix the seal in token of receipt of R.D. deposits. When accounts were closed on 6.3.2007 on production of pass books the complainants could not have sought for withdrawal on 28.2.2009. MIS accounts were closed on 6.3.2007 only after production of pass books and submission of SB-7(A) withdrawal form. The complainants possessed the pass books before handing over them to Ops 6 & 7. MIS accounts of complainants 1, 3 and 4 were opened through one Smt. G. Parvathamma, SAS agent and another MIS account of Smt. K. Srivani and K. Satish Babu was opened through G. Malleswara Rao (Op6). Therefore the allegation that they have believed Op6 for renewal of MIS when they opened through Smt. G. Parvathamma could not be true. When the complainants had submitted SB-7 withdrawal forms along with pass books and on the basis of withdrawal forms only MIS accounts were closed. RD account is a separate one and has no connection with MIS accounts. Monthly deposits were deposited up to March, 2009 and the RD pass books were up dated. MIS accounts Nos. 106286, 112431, 16 were closed prematurely on 6.3.2007 and 2.5.2008 respectively and the amounts Rs. 5,94,000/-, Rs. 1,96,000/- and RS. 2,94,000/- were withdrawn on those dates on production of pass books and on the request made on SB-7 forms. In respect of MIS a/c No. 112429 the closure amount of Rs. 2,94,000/- was deposited in S.B account on 14.5.2007 and the amount was withdrawn by the complainant on the same day. There were deposits in R.D. up to March, 2009 and up dated the entries up to 26.3.2009. On receipt of pass books and SB-7 withdrawal forms from the complainants the postal authorities who had dealt had satisfied with the signatures of the complainant No. 2 and then only accounts were closed and given the amounts. In fact the very signatures of complainant No. 2 at various dates were not found similar. Complainant No. 2 had taken MIS interest on different dates. The amounts of Rs. 14 lakhs was paid to the complainants. If they had any grievance they could ask by producing MIS pass books. There was neither negligence nor deficiency in service on their part. The complainants are not entitled to the amounts. They have given correct reply to the notice issued by them. Ops 6 & 7 were appointed by the Dist. Collector & Special Tahsildhar (National Savings), and they were under their control. A departmental enquiry was initiated in regard to the above said transactions. As per rules 2% to SAS agent on MIS business and 4% commission on RD deposits would be given to MPKBY agent at the post office. Since MIS accounts were closed prematurely they were not entitled to any terminal bonus or any compensation. The proper forum in case of this nature could be Civil Court. This Commission had no jurisdiction and therefore prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs.
4) Op5 Dist. Collector equally resisted the case. While denying each and every allegation made in the complaint he alleged that though the Collector had administrative supervision over the working of National Savings organization in the district and all the banking transactions are done by the postal authorities and liable for action when they failed to discharge efficiently. He cannot be held responsible for mis-deeds of postal authorities or agents more over in cases of cheating, forgery, and fraud etc. He only recommends the appointment of agents who in turn work directly under the postal authorities save that release of commission which would be rooted through him on the basis of details submitted by the postal authorities. The Dist. Collector appoints agents under MPKBY and the Special Tahsildhar is authorised to appoint SAS agents. Ops 6 & 7 were appointed as agents in 1994 and 1995 respectively and attached to Head Post Office, Kadapa for canvassing the business under National Savings Scheme. The transactions mentioned by the complainant were specifically pertain to postal department and had nothing to do with him. The allegation of fraudulent premature withdrawal cannot be answered by him. The Director General, Posts vide their letter dt. 29.8.2001 has specified that ‘payments of maturity value including interest on MIS account if it is Rs. 20,000/- or more should be paid by way of cheque only by the post office. Any withdrawal of amounts above Rs. 20,000/- by cash was contrary to prevailing rules and regulations they were irregular. More over already criminal proceedings were initiated. At no stretch of imagination he could be held guilty of deficiency in service and therefore prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs.
5) Since notices issued to Ops 6 & 7 agents returned with postal endorsement ‘Left’ and since it is their last known address, however paper publication in ‘Vartha’ Telugu daily was also made, and in the light of Section 28(A)(3) of Consumer Protection Act notice deemed to be sufficiently served.
6) The complainant in proof of his case filed his affidavit evidence and got Exs. A1 to A14 marked while the Dist. Collector, Kadapa filed his affidavit evidence and got Exs. B1 to B9 marked. The postal authorities filed the affidavit evidence of Superintendent of Post Offices, Kadapa and got Exs. B10 to B62 marked.
7) The points that arise for consideration are :
i. Whether the agents Ops 6 & 7 had forged the signatures of the complainant and mis-represented by committing fraud on the complainants to withdraw the amounts?
ii. Whether this Commission had jurisdiction to try the case where complicated questions of fact and law are to be decided?
iii. To what relief?
8 It is an undisputed fact that complainant No. 1 is the father-in-law of complainant No. 2 and grand father of complainant Nos. 3 & 4. He invested Rs. 14 lakhs in Monthly Income Scheme (MIS) and Recurring Deposit (R.D) with the Post Master, HPO, Kadapa (OP4) details of which were mentioned while narrating the facts of the complaint. At this juncture it may be stated that thought the complainant had stated that they have opened the accounts through agents Ops 6 & 7 a perusal of Exs. B13, B15, B17 applications for opening of MIS accounts would show they were opened through SAS agent G. Parvathamma. MIS a/c No. 106286 of Smt. K. Srivani & K. Satish Babu were opened through Op6. G. Parvathamma was not impleaded, despite such averment was made by the postal authorities, more so, when the documents reveal the said fact.
9) Be that as it may, admittedly MIS amounts were withdrawn on
11.2.2007, 14.5.2007, and 2.5.2008 respectively which according to Op3 on furnishing pass books, withdrawal forms and on the request made on SB-7 forms. They are marked as Exs. B12, B14, B16, B18 and B19. The ledger entries are marked as Exs. B20 to B28. Equally SB-7 for withdrawing interest on MIS accounts standing in the names of the complainants vide Exs. B40 to B58. The complainant could not deny, however, he intends to explain by stating:
“ I humbly submit that at that stage as the monthly income scheme were matured on 28.2.2009, I sought for withdrawal of the same. The Ops 6 & 7 convinced me that by renewing the deposits under MIS scheme, they would get the same rate of interest and as such they will be much benefited. Hence believing the version of the Ops 6 & 7 we gave our consent for renewal.”
He further stated that “ When I got verified the forms submitted for premature withdrawal upon comparison, I came to know that the opposite parties have forged the signatures of 2nd complainant and presented the same for premature payment and curiously the post master had paid the said amounts by closing the account without personal appearance also in the absence of the account books and also in the absence of withdrawal form in proper format or the authorization letter seeking from ourselves had handed over the payments in cash to the agents which is absolutely contrary to the law also against the rules framed by the department. At this juncture it is pertinent to mention that any amount or any payment exceeding Rs. 20,000/- should be paid only by cheque bearing a/c payee stamp and we are astonished the way in which the payments of huge amounts to a tune of about Rs. 14 lakhs were paid in cash violating the rules that too to the postal agents without routing the amounts through the savings bank of our accounts.”
He further stated that “I humbly submit that without there being collusion or abetment of the opposite parties with the agents, no such fraud could be committed. I understand that fraud has been committed in our account and the Head Post Office as well as the agents are hand in glove and committed the fraud.”
From the above, it is beyond doubt that the complainant had admittedly handed over the pass books. The contention of the opposite parties is that there was no renewal procedure in MIS scheme to get the same rate of interest. When admittedly pass books were produced along with SB-7 and withdrawal forms vide exhibits mentioned above the amounts were paid and accounts were closed. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Kadapa in his affidavit evidence stated that “MIS accounts are to be closed only on production of pass books and no authorization letter is required for closure of MIS accounts. The withdrawal form is enough for closure of MIS account. Equally so in regard to R.D. accounts. R.D. accounts were up dated up to 26.3.2009.”
10) The complainant, when made serious allegations of fraud, forgery, cheating and mis-representation and admittedly when they have given a complaint to the police and investigation is in progress, he did not choose to file an application to send the disputed documents to a hand-writing expert in order to prove that they were forged. In fact the postal authorities had asserted that the very signature of complainant No. 2 on various dates were not similar and gave the instances which were not contradicted by the complainant by filing additional affidavit evidence. Unless the complainant establishes that signatures are forged and by mis-representing pass books were taken, amounts were withdrawn contrary to various regulations which requires adjudication of complicated questions of fact and law, no definitive opinion could be given. A reading of entire record would undoubtedly disclose that unless elaborate documentary and oral evidence is let in besides the circumstances under which pass books were parted to the agents and the circumstances under which various signatures appearing on various forms filed under Exs. B11 to B16 are known, it is not possible to state that the opposite parties are guilty of forgery, fraud, mis-representation and confirm other facts alleged against them.
11) The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Munimahesh Patel reported in IV (2006) CPJ 1 (SC) has observed :
“The nature of the proceedings before the Commission are essentially in summary nature. The factual position was required to be established by documents. Commission was required to examine whether in view of disputed facts it would exercise the jurisdiction. The State Commission was right in its view that the complex factual position requires that the matter should be examined by an appropriate court of law and not by the Commission.”
12) The learned counsel for the complainant relying a decision in Union of India Vs. Arun Borse & Others reported in 2007 (2) CPJ 310 (NC) contended that the Director General, Posts vide their letter dt. 29.8.2001 has specified that ‘payments of maturity value including interest on MIS account if it is Rs. 20,000/- or more should be paid by way of cheque only by the post office. Any withdrawal of amounts above Rs. 20,000/- by cash was contrary to prevailing rules would make postal authorities liable. We may state that if there is no dispute as to the facts, the question as to the payments contrary to the instructions, could be one of the grounds for consideration. However, when the very withdrawals are questioned alleging that they were forged and that pass books were obtained by mis-representation they need factual determination, only after finding out the truth, consideration of various circulars governing the withdrawals etc. will arise. We are of the firm opinion that on the evidence placed on record, we may not be able to give an opinion as to the truth or otherwise of the contentions, more so, when they have to be adjudicated by leading both oral as well as documentary evidence.
13) At the cost of repetition, we may state that the dispute in regard to various accounts would undoubtedly require detailed evidence to be led. It requires oral evidence to be let in besides proving of disputed documents. It is obvious that very detailed evidence has to be led both to prove the claim and thereafter to prove the damages etc. It is not an appropriate case to be heard and disposed of in a summary fashion. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the complaint before this Commission is not maintainable.
14) In the result the complaint is dismissed leaving the complainant to take appropriate proceedings for establishing his claim and for seeking reliefs in court of competent jurisdiction. In the circumstances no costs.
1) _______________________________
PRESIDENT
2) ________________________________
MEMBER
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR
COMPLAINANT: OPPOSITE PARTIES
None None.
Documents marked for complainant:
Ex A-1 Special power of attorney
Ex A-2 Representation by complainants to Post Master, Head Post office, Kadapa
Ex A-3 Representation by complainants to District Collector, Kadapa.
Ex A-4 Representation by complainants to Chief Post Master General, Andhra Pradesh Circle, Hyderabad
Ex A-5 Representation by complainants to Superintendent of Post office, Kadapa
Ex A-6 Reply given by Superintendent of Post offices, Kadapa ( along with annexure)
Ex A-7 Representation by complainants to District Collector, Kadapa
Ex A-8 Letter issued by Special Tahsildar, NSS, Kadapa to complainants (along with annexure)
Ex A-9 Office copy of complaint filed by complainants before Hon’ble Ist Addl. Judical Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa.
Ex A-10 FIR No. 98/2009 (Xerox copy)
Ex A-11 Statement
Ex A-12 ASLAS form issued by the Agent as well as the Post Master.
Ex A-13 News paper cuttings (Xerox copies)
Ex A-14 Office copy of legal notice issued to opposite parties.
Documents marked for Opposite Parties:
Ex B-1 Letter dt : 30-3-2009 from Dr. M. Rajasekhar to the District Collector, Kadapa
Ex B-2 Telegram dt 31.3.2009 vide R.C.No. 116/2009 Supdt . of Post office, Kadapa.
Ex B-3 Telugu written version letter of Special Tahsildar, National Savings Scheme, Kadapa vide R.No. 116/2009 dt : 30.3.2009
Ex B-4 Copy of Letter cover showing Regd. Letter addressed to Sri G. Malleswara Rao from Collections Clerk, National saving institute, Kadapa.
Ex B-5 Proceedings of the District Collector, Kadapa vide R.C.No.116/2009 dt: 4.5.2009
Ex B-6 Letter No.116/2009 dt : 4.5.2009 of Spl. Tahsildar, Kadapa to the State House Officer, Kadapa.
Ex B-7 Proceedings of the Special Tahsildar, N.S.S. Kadapa vide dt : 15.7.2006.
Ex B-8 Procedings of the District Collector , Kadapa vide No.144/2007 dt : 17.3.2007.
Ex B-9 Copy of Hand Book for psot office 2004-2005.
Ex B-10 Charge sheet in Kadapa I-Town Police pertaining to Crime No.98/09 under section 406,409,420,424 r/w 34 IPC along with the Memo of
Evidence in Kadapa –I Town Police Station Cr.No.98/09
U/s.406,409,420,424 r/w 34 IPC.
Ex B-11 Application for opening of joint B MIS Account (SB-3 Card) 106286 standing in the name of Smt. K. Srivani and Sri M. SAtisha Babu
Ex B-12 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for premature closure of joint B MIS Account No.106286 standing in kthe name of Smt. K. Srivani and Sri M. Satish Babu dated : 6.3.2007 for S.5,94,000/-.
Ex B-13 Application for opening of MIS Account (SB-3 Card ) 112431 standing in the name of Sri Dr. M. Rajasekhar
Ex B-14 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for premature closure of MIS account No.
112431 standing in the name of Sri Dr. M. Rajasekhar dated : 11-12-2007
for Rs.1,96,000 .
Ex B-15 Application for opening of MIS Account (SB-3 Card) 112429 standing in
the name of Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian smt.
K. Srivani.
Ex B-16 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for premature closure of MIS account No.
112429 standing in the name of Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through
mother guardian smt. K. Srivani. Dated : 14-5-2007 for Rs.2,94,000/-
Ex B-17 Application for opening of MIS Account (SB-3 Card) 112430 standing in the name of Sri M. Srisarayu (Minor) operated through mother
Guardian mother guardian Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-18 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for premature closure of MIS Account No. 112430 standing in the name of Sri M. Srisarayu (minor) operated through mother guardian smt. K. Srivani dated : 2-5-2008 for Rs.2,94,000/- .
Ex B-19 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing amount of Rs.2,94,000/- dated : 14.5.2007 from SB Account No. 430438(Joint B) standing
in the name of Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-20 Ledger entries in respect of Joint B MIS Account No. 106286 standing in the name of Smt. K. Srivani and Sri M. Satish Babu
Ex B-21 Ledger entries in respect of MIS Account (SB-3 Card) 112431 standing in the name of Sri Dr. M. Rajasekhar.
Ex B-22 Ledger entries in respect of MIS account (SB-3 Card) 112430 standing in the name of Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operted through mother guardian Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-23 Ledger entries in respect of MIS account (SB-3 Card) 112429 standing in the name of Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operted through mother guardian Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-24 Ledger entreis in respect of SB Account No. 430438 (Joint B) standing in the name of Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-25 Ledger entries in respect of RD Account No.16346 standing in the name of Sri K. Srivani with denomination of Rs.4500/- pm.
Ex B-26 Ledger entreis in respect of RD Account No. 19763 standing in the name of Sri M. Saketh with denomination of Rs.2,000/- p.m.
Ex B-27 Ledger entreis in respect of RD Account No. 1976 standing in the name of Sri M. SriSarayu with denomination of Rs.2,000/- p.m.
Ex B-28 Ledger entreis in respect of RD Account No. 19771 standing in the name of Sri M. Rajasekhar with denomination of Rs.1350/- p.m.
Ex B-29 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 31-08-2006 for depositing Rs.9850/- towards 4 RD accounts.
Ex B-30 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 21-09-2006 for depositing Rs.9880/- towards 9 RD accounts.
Ex B-31 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 21-09-2006 for depositing Rs.9900/- towards 3 RD accounts.
Ex B-32 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 21-09-2006 for depositing Rs.9800/- towards 8 RD accounts.
Ex B-33 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 30-10-2006 for depositing Rs.9580/- towards 6 RD accounts.
Ex B-34 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 28-12-2006 for depositing Rs.9690/- towards 6 RD accounts.
Ex B-35 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 28-12-2006 for depositing Rs.9880/- towards 6 RD accounts.
Ex B-36 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 21-02-2007 for depositing Rs.10090/- towards 4 RD accounts.
Ex B-37 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 21-02-2007 for depositing Rs.9820/- towards 5 RD accounts.
Ex B-38 Form Aslas -6 submitted by Smt. B.K. Satya MPKBY No.488334 Cuddapah HO dated : 24-02-2007 for depositing Rs.9840/- towards 10 RD accounts.
Ex B-39 SB Order 5/2003 of Government of India, Ministry of Communications & IT Department of Posts, ES Division , Sansad Marg, New Delhi -1100001 dated : 5-3-2003.
Ex B-40 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.9000/- dated 26-10-2006 from MIS Account No. 106286 Joint B standing in the
47 name of Smt. K. Srivani and Sri M. Satish Babu
Ex B-41 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.4500/- dated 28-02-2007 from MIS Account No. 106286 Joint B standing in the
47 name of Smt. K. Srivani and Sri M. Satish Babu
Ex B-42 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated 07-11-2006 from MIS Account No. 112429 standing in the
Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-43 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated 05-02-2007 from MIS Account No. 112429 standing in the
Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-44 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated 02-03-2007 from MIS Account No. 112429 standing in the
Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-45 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated 10-04-2007 from MIS Account No. 112429 standing in the
Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-46 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
3-05-2007 from MIS Account No. 112429 standing in the
Sri M. Saketh (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-47 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
07-11-2006 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-48 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
07-12-2006 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-49 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
05-02-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-50 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
02-03-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-51 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
03-05-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-52 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
02-07-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-53 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
02-08-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-54 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
04-10-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-55 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
02-11-2007 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-56 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated 08-01-2008 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-57 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
03-03-2008 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-58 Withdrawal form (SB-7) for withdrawing interest of Rs.2000/- dated
03-04-2008 from MIS Account No. 112430 Joint B standing in the
Sri M. Srisarayu (minor ) operated through mother guardian
Smt. K. Srivani.
Ex B-59 Proceedings of the Special Tahsildar N.S.S., Kadapa under Rc.No.221/2006 dated : 15.7.2006 renewing the S.A.S. Agency of Sri G. Malleswara Rao to continue for 3 years.
Ex B-60 Proceedings of the District Collector, Kadapa under R.C.No. 144/2007 dated : 17-3-2007 renewing the agency of Smt. B. Kanaka Satya to continue for 3 years.
Ex B-61 Application dated 29-4-2009 received from Sri Dr. M. Rajsekhar Seeking information under Right to Information Act.
Ex B-62 Information given to Sri Dr. M. Rajasekhar for his application dated 29-4-2009 under RTI Act vide SPO’s Cuddapah letter No.CPT /RTI/06 dated : 21.5.2009.
1) _______________________________
PRESIDENT
2) ________________________________
MEMBER
Dt. 10. 11. 2010.
*pnr
“UP LOAD – O.K.”