BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH Miscellaneous Application No.05 of 2013 in Consumer Complaint No.646 of 2012 Surinder Kumar Mittal Vs. State Government of Haryana, through The Chief Secretary to Government of Haryana & ors. PRESENT: Sh.Surinder Kumar Mittal, Applicant/Complainant in person. Dated the 17th day of January, 2013 ORDER The Consumer Complaint No.646 of 2012 was dismissed for non prosecution on 28.12.2012 as neither the complainant nor any authorized agent had appeared on his behalf. The instant miscellaneous application has been filed for restoration of the said complaint. In view of the ratio of the case ‘Rajeev Hitendra Pathak & ors. vs. Achyut Kashinath Karekar & anr.’ IV (2011) CPJ 35 (SC), this Forum has no jurisdiction to review its own order. Hence, the application is not maintainable and the same is dismissed in limine. Certified copy of this order be communicated to the applicant/complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned. Sd/- Sd/- (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU) (MADHU MUTNEJA) MEMBER PRESIDING MEMBER
| MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER | MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER | , | |