Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/499/2010

Misra Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of Patiala - Opp.Party(s)

27 Aug 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 499 of 2010
1. Misra SinghS/o Late Sh. Mota Singh R/o House No. 4250, Sector-46 Cahndigarh and also at Chamber No.-3 District Court Sector-17, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. State Bank of PatialaADB Bassi Pathana Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib through its Manager2. The General Manager State bank of Patiala ADB Bassi Pathana Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 27 Aug 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                   

                                                            Complaint Case No. 499 of 2010

 

 

Misra Singh s/o Late Sh.Mota Singh, R/o H.No.4250, Sector 46, Chandigarh and also at Chamber No.3, District Court, Sector 17, Chandigarh

                                                                                                            –    Complainant

 

                                                Versus

 

1.         State Bank of Patiala, ADB, Bassi Pathana, Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib, through its Manager.

2.         The General Manager, State Bank of Patiala, ADB, Bassi Pathana, Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib.

                                                                                                            - Opposite Parties

 

Present:         Sh.Hitender Kansal, Advocate for Complainant.

 

                                                           

Dated, the 27th day of August, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The learned counsel for complainant has made statement that he may kindly be allowed to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file fresh before the appropriate Forum having territorial jurisdiction. Accordingly, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file fresh before the appropriate Forum having territorial jursidcition, subject to law of limitation.

                        Copy of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                     1st MEMBER

 

 


MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT ,