Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/1985/2023

Arun Kumar(Dead) Susila Tiwari - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of India & Anothers - Opp.Party(s)

Ashutosh Mishra & Vijay Kumar Mishra

22 Dec 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/1985/2023
( Date of Filing : 14 Dec 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/04/2022 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/104/2016 of District Sultanpur)
 
1. Arun Kumar(Dead) Susila Tiwari
Village Nokoupur Thana Gosaiganj Pargana Barosa, Vikas Khand Jaysingh Tehsil Jaysingh Dist.-Sultanpur
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. State Bank of India & Anothers
Branch Kadipur Dist.- Sultanpur Through its Manager
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Dec 2023
Final Order / Judgement

ORAL

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                           UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW       

          A/1985/2023

          Smt. Sushila Tiwari V/s State Bank of India and others      

            22-12-2023

                   BY MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR, PRESIDENT

                                                 ORDER

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the order passed by the learned District Consumer Commission, Sultanpur in Complaint Case No. 104/2016 dated 11-04-2022 by which the aforesaid complaint has been dismissed in default of both the parties.

The appeal has been filed with delay condonation application. Appellant has shown sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. Cause shown for delay is explained, therefore, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.         

Sri Ashutosh Mishra, learned Counsel for the appellant appeared.

            I have heard Counsel for the appellant at the admission stage itself and perused the impugned order as well as record.

            I have also gone through the memo of appeal and have considered the submission made by Counsel for the appellant. The appellant/complainant has given sufficient reasons for her absence.

            Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the appeal is allowed and the impugned order passed by the District Consumer Commission, Sultanpur is set aside and the case is remanded back to the District Consumer Commission, Sultanpur with request to restore the Complaint Case No. 104/2016; Arun Kumar V/s State Bank of India and others to its original number and decide the complaint expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order in accordance with law. It is made clear that unnecessary adjournments will not be allowed to either of the parties. 

A copy of this order will be served by the appellant before the District Consumer Commission, Sultanpur within a period of four weeks from today.

Let copy of this order be made available to the parties as per rules.

The Stenographer is requested to upload this order on the website of this Commission at the earliest.

 

           

                                        ( JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR )                                       

                                           PRESIDENT 

            Pnt.

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.