Per Mr. P.N.Kashalkar, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          Appellant was directed to supply two additional sets of compilation. Two sets have already been given after passage of order sheet dated 01/7/2010.  One copy is also given to the respondent.

          Complainant whose complaint has been dismissed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur on 12/2/2009 has filed this appeal belatedly and there has been delay of 78 days in filing this appeal.  Counsel for the appellant has filed condonation of delay application being M.A.No.927/2009 and delay of 78 days is mentioned in the said application.  Delay of 78 days is not properly explained in the condonation of delay and in the affidavit filed in support thereof.  Ground taken is that applicant is presently residing at Pune and she did not pursue the matter in time and she was not aware about the procedure.  This is something which cannot be heard of.  Everybody is presumed to know law.  Ignorance of law is no excuse.  That is well settled principle of law.  In any case grounds given in the condonation of delay application are not sound enough to condone the delay.  As such, we are not inclined to condone the delay. Hence the following order:-

                                                          ORDER

Misc.application for condonation of delay stands rejected.

Consequently, appeal stands dismissed.

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.