BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.142 of 2010 Rajdeep Singh Vs. State Bank of India & anr. PRESENT: Sh.Maheshinder Singh, Counsel for Complainant. Qua OP No.1 withdrawn. Sh.Sandeep Suri, Counsel for OP No.2. Dated the 26th day of September, 2012 ORDER Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:- “Due to technical defect, the complainant does not want to pursue this complaint at this stage. However, the complainant reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect. This complaint be dismissed as withdrawn with permission to file fresh on the same cause of action.” In view of the above statement of counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law. Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU) (LAKSHMAN SHARMA) (MADHU MUTNEJA) MEMBER PRESIDENT MEMBER
| MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBER | HONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT | MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER | |