1. Parties have arrived at a compromise. It is stated at the Bar by learned Shri J.B. Mudgil, Advocate for opposite parties No.2, 3 & 5 to 10 and Shri Seeraj Bagga, Advocate on behalf of opposite parties No.11 & 13 that their clients have no objection if opposite party No.1 allow the operation of the subject bank accounts mentioned in prayer Clause-a of the complaint by the incumbent Principal Dr. (Mrs.) Charanjit Mahal or any other person officiating as Principal 2. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that in view of the above noted concession given at the bar by the opposite parties No.2, 3 & 5 to 10 as also opposite parties No.11 & 13, the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. Pursuant to the settlement, opposite party No.1 shall allow the incumbent Principal whether regularly appointed or officiating to operate the subject bank accounts viz., SB A/c No.15593, CA No.34318, SB A/c No.15600, SB A/c No.15598, CA No.34317, CA No.32319 and SB A/c No.15599 maintained as rincipalaccounts with the opposite party Bank. 3. In view of the above assurance given by the opposite parties, learned counsel for the complainant does not press this complaint. The complaint is, therefore, disposed of in terms of above noted compromise and the indemnity furnished earlier by the complainant in terms of the interim order passed by this Commission stands discharged. Parties shall be bound by the statements made by the respective counsel on their behalf. 4. Copy of this order be given dasti.