STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                    UNIONTERRITORY,CHANDIGARH

Munni Devi w/o Late Sh. Binod Kumar Balmiki R/o House No.907, Near Dainik Bhasker, Sector 25-D,Chandigarh.

Versus

1]    State Bank ofIndia,BranchPanjabUniversity, Sector 14,Chandigarh

2]    SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd., Regional Office, SCO 109, 3^rdChandigarh

---Respondents/Opposite Parties.

BEFORE:

Argued by:Sh. Rajnish Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

2.          

3.          It was further stated that neither there was any deficiency, in rendering service, on the part of the Opposite Party No.1 nor did it indulge into unfair trade practice. The remaining averments, were denied, being wrong.

4.          

5.          

6.          

7.          

8.           

9.          

10.        

11.         

12.        

13.        

14.        

15.         

16.       

17.        

18.        

19. 

20.        

Pronounced.

1^st.

Sd/-          

                                                                            Sd/-

                            [DEV RAJ]

                                                                            Ad/-

STATE COMMISSION

(First Appeal No.473 of 2013)

Argued by:Sh. Rajnish Tyagi, Advocate for the appellant.

Dated the 1^st

ORDER