Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/364/2013

C.Arun Prasad - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

Party in person

20 Oct 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   18.11.2013

                                                                        Date of Order :   20.10.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT            

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

             DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.364/2013

     FRIDAY THIS  20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

Mr. C.Arun Prasad,

S/o. Chitraranjan Babu,

Male, Aged about 34 years,

14/6, Shri Lakshmi Street,

100 Ft Road, Nanganallur,

Chennai 600 061.                                       .. Complainant

 

                                        ..Vs..

1.  The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

In-charge of

ATM ID S10A000800041,

Location, MGR Road,

Nanganallur, Chennai 600 061.

 

2. The Assistant General Manager,

State Bank of Travancore,

Mount Road Branch, H.P.A; Plaza,

162, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

 

3. The Assistant General Manager,

State Bank of Travancore,

Customer Service Department,

Head Office

Tirvandrum 695 012.

 

4. The Chief Manager,

ATM Transactions,

State Bank of India,

115, Broadway Orient House,

Chennai 600 001.                                          .. Opposite parties

 

Counsel for Complainant                    :  M/s. R.Vetrivel    

Counsel for opposite parties 1 & 4      :  Exparte

Counsel for the opposite parties 2 & 3 :  M/s. Venkatachalapathy

 

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

          This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to refund a sum of Rs.20,000/- lost by the complainant and also to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards deficiency of service and delay of the payment and to pay Rs.30,000/- towards cost of the complaint.

 

         Proof affidavit of complainant not filed for long time.  The complainant  also called absent.  Hence proof affidavit of complainant is closed and this complaint is dismissed for default.  No costs.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.