Haryana

Panchkula

ea/66/2015

vinod kumar verma. - Complainant(s)

Versus

state bank of india. - Opp.Party(s)

BALJINDER SINGH

04 Feb 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.                                                                                  

Execution Application No.

:

66 of 2015

Date of Institution

:

05.11.2015

Date of Decision

:

04.02.2016

                       

1.         Vinod Kumar Verma

2.         Parveen Kumari Verma,

            Both R/o village Barwala, Tehsil and District Panchkula.

                                                                                                   ….Complainant/DH

Versus

1.         State Bank of India, Khatauli (now Barwala), Tehsil and District Panchkula-134118 through its Branch Manager Ajay Kapoor.

2.         Ajay Kapoor, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Khatauli (now Barwala), Tehsil and District Panchkula.

3.         State Bank of India, Regional Business Office, Sector-5, Panchkula through its Regional Officer.

                                                                                ….Opposite Parties/JDs

 

Before:           Mr. Dharam Pal, President.

      Mrs.Anita Kapoor, Member.

      Mr.S.P.Attri, Member.

 

Present:          Mr.Baljinder Singh, Adv., for the complainant.

                        Mr.Sanjeev Gupta, Adv., for the Ops.

 

                       

                        On 25.01.2016, counsel for the Ops has tendered a cheque of Rs.56,105.47/- vide bearing No.621843 dated 16.01.2016 drawn in State Bank of India in compliance of order under execution application and also stated that order under execution has been fully complied with.

Today counsel for the complainant has made a separate statement in which he states that he has received a Bank Demand Draft of Rs.56,105.47/- vide bearing No.621843 dated 16.01.2016 drawn at SBI in compliance of order under execution application. Now nothing remains towards the Ops. So, he wants to withdraw his present execution application being fully satisfied.

                        Heard. In view of the statement, the present execution application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. We order accordingly.

                        A copy of this order be sent to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to record room after due compliance.

 

 

Dt.04.02.2016           (S.P.Attri)                   (Anita Kapoor)               (Dharam Pal)

                                    Member                      Member                           President

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.