Haryana

Panchkula

CC/61/2019

RAJENDAR SHARMA. - Complainant(s)

Versus

STATE BANK OF INDIA. - Opp.Party(s)

COMPLAINANT IN PERSON

16 Nov 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                                     

Consumer Complaint No.	:	61 of 2019
Date of Institution	:	31.01.2019
Date of Decision	:	16.11.2023

Rajendar Sharma, aged 37 years, son of Late Shri Sarup Chand Sharma, resident of House No. 57, Harmilap Nagar, Phase II, Baltana, Sub-Tehsil Zirakpur, District SAS Nagar Mohali (Punjab). 7973912670.

                                                                                      ­….Complainant

Versus

1.       State Bank of India, SCO No. 14, Sector 10, Panchkula through its Branch          Manager.

2.       Bajaj Finance Ltd. 1^st and 2^nd Floor, SCO No. 57/58/59, Sector 17-A, U.T.,           Chandigarh through its authorized signatory.

….Opposite Parties

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 AS AMENDED UPTO DATE

Before:        Mr. Satpal, President.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.     

                   Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav, Member                              

 

Present:-      Shri Sudhir Gupta, Advocate, along with Complainant.

                   Shri Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate, for OP No.1(Defence                                            already struck off vide order dated 09.05.2019).

                   Shri Chetan Gupta, Advocate, for OP No. 2

                            

                    Today the case is fixed for consideration on the application dated 16.11.2021 moved by OP No. 1 seeking the recall/setting aside of order dated 09.05.2019 passed by the Commission, whereby, its defence was ordered to be struck off

                   At this stage, the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the OP No.2, by making a separate statement, states that a sum of Rs. 1,385/- is outstanding being principal amount, in favour of the OP No. 2, and in case, the Complainant makes a payment of Rs. 1,385/- to the OP No. 2, no objection certificate would be issued by the OP No. 2, within 45 days from today, to the Complainant.

                   On the other hand, the Complainant, by making a separate statement, states that he has gone through the statement made by the Ld. Counsel for the OP No. 2, and he agrees with the same. The Complainant further states that today, he has paid the said amount i.e. Rs. 1,385/- by way of cash, to the Ld. Counsel for the OP No. 2, and withdraws the present complaint, being fully satisfied.

                    Heard. In view of the statements made by both the parties, the present complaint is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, being fully satisfied, and the OP No. 2 is directed to issue the NOC to the Complainant, within 45 days of this order, as per the statement made by the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the OP No. 2. Also, it is made clear that in case, the OP No. 2 fails to comply with the statement made by the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the OP No. 2, in that event, the Complainant shall be entitled to invoke proceedings under section 71/72 of the CP Act, 2019.

                   A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs, and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.              (Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav)       (Dr.Sushma Garg)                   (Satpal)

16.11.2023         Member                            Member                         President