Maharashtra

Chandrapur

CC/20/98

Shri.Manjitsigh Gurudayalsigh Kalara - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of India Through Branch Manager Ballarpur - Opp.Party(s)

A U Kullarwar

07 Jan 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHANDRAPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/98
( Date of Filing : 12 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Shri.Manjitsigh Gurudayalsigh Kalara
Alapalli Road,Ballarpur,Tah.Ballarpur,Dist.Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. State Bank of India Through Branch Manager Ballarpur
Ballarpur,Tah.Ballarpur,Dist.Chandrapur
Chandrapur
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 07 Jan 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Final Order / Judgement

(Dated : 07/01/ 2022)

PER SHRI.ATUL D.ALSI, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

    1.               The complainant has filed this complaint against non return of   

    mortgage documents even after repayment of loan and foreclosure of loan  

    account and thereby praying for compensation of Rs.4,90,000/- with costs.   

    Facts, in brief, are as under..

2.               The complainant availed a housing loan for construction of his house as per loan account No.2399828730786 against equitable mortgage of sale-deed bearing No.2554/91 dated 23/8/1991. The complainant paid last repayment amount of Rs.40,000/- on 30/10/2017 and the OP bank also closed loan account of the complainant and issued no due certificate for the foreclosure of loan account on 27/12/2017 in favour of complainant. The complainant, after foreclosure of the loan account, demanded the release of equitable mortgage documents of property on 7/4/2020 and 4/8/2020 and also by issuing legal notice through Adv. Kullarwar on 18/8/2020, but the OP Bank failed to release the mortgage documents. Hence the petition is filed ..

3.               After admission of the complaint, the notice was duly served on the OP Bank, but it chose to remain absent and did not file any reply. Hence the case proceeded ex-parte against the OP Bank vide order dated 17/01/2021 passed by this Commission below Exh.1.

4.             The complainant has filed no due certificate dated 27/12/2017 issued by the OP Bank in favour of the complainant at Exh.3 in respect of foreclosure of the loan account. The complainant also filed evidence by way of affidavit at Exh.9.  

5.             We have perused the complaint, affidavits and supporting documents filed by the complainant.  After careful scrutiny thereof, we record our findings to the issue of deficiency in service as under,

                                                         

REASONING


6.            On perusal of the No due certificate dated 27/12/2017 issued by the OP Bank in favour of the complainant towards closure of the loan account,  which the complainant has filed at Exh.3, it is crystal clear that the complainant has cleared the housing loan taken by him from the OP. From the documents placed on record by the complainant, it is also evident that after foreclosure of the loan account, the complainant has demanded the release of equitable mortgage documents of property orally and also by issuing legal notice through Adv. Kullarwar on 18/8/2020. In this scenario, it is the duty of the OP Bank to release the equitable mortgage documents after completion of return of document formalities, but the OP Bank failed to do so, and it clearly amounts to deficiency in service.

               Therefore, this Commission is of the considered view that the OP Bank requires to be directed to release the equitable mortgage documents kept with it against the loan for which it has issued no due certificate dated 27/12/2017, which is filed by the complainant on record at Exh.3. The complainant must have suffered mental agony, due to non-release of mortgage documents and was also required to file and pursue this complaint, as such, he is also entitled to adequate compensation for mental agony and cost.

7.             In furtherance of our observations as above, we proceed to pass the following order..  

ORDER

 

  1. The complaint No.CC/20/98 is partly allowed.
  2. The OP Bank shall release the equitable mortgage documents in favour of  complainant, after completing necessary formalities for which no due certificate dated 27/12/2017 has been issued by OP-Bank.
  3. The OP Bank shall also pay to the complainant an amount of Rs. 20,000/-  towards compensation for mental agony Rs. 10,000/- towards cost of litigation.
  4. Copy of the order be furnished to the parties free of cost.
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.