Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/227/2014

T. KRISHNAMOORTHY - Complainant(s)

Versus

STATE BANK OF INDIA, THE MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

A.R. SURESH

18 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/227/2014
( Date of Filing : 03 Jul 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. T. KRISHNAMOORTHY
B.C.N. KANDIGAI VILLAGE, THIRUTTANI TALUK, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, THE MANAGER
THIRUTTANI BRANCH, THIRUTTANI, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 18 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

                      BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                                Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.227/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.5/2010, dated:24.02.2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Thiruvallur)

                                                           DATED THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

T. Krishnamoorthy,

S/o. Duraisamy Naidu,

B.C.N kandigai Village,

Thiruttani Taluk,

Thiruvallur District.                                                         .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

 

-Versus-

The Manager,

State Bank of India,

Thiruttani Branch

Thiruttani

Thiruvallur District                                                     .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for the Appellants / Opposite party       : M/s. A.R. Suresh

Counsel for the Respondent  / Complainant      : M/s. N. Chandra raj

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 18.11.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order::                                                                                                

Docket order

 

            No representation for Appellant. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for arguments in list. When this matter was called at 11.00 A.M., there is no representation for the Appellant. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 noon, but the Appellant was again not present. Since the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                 Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.