Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/53/2014

Sri Sambhu Kishore Panda, aged 39 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of India, Being represented by its Branch Manager, Motiganj Evening Branch, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Bikash Mohan Das & Others

29 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/53/2014
( Date of Filing : 11 Apr 2014 )
 
1. Sri Sambhu Kishore Panda, aged 39 years
S/o. Gayadhar Panda, At- Garadapur, P.S/Dist- Bhadrak. At Present-C/o. Minu Das, Shreya Kutir, Shree Vihar, Shreekanthapur, P.S- Town, Dist- Balasore-756001.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. State Bank of India, Being represented by its Branch Manager, Motiganj Evening Branch, Balasore
At/P.O- Motiganj, P.S- Balasore Town, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. Zonal Manager, State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar
Near Keshari Talkies, Besides Reserve Bank of India, Unit-2, Kharvel Nagar, Bhubaneswar.
Khurda
Odisha
3. Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Bhubaneswar
LHO, Bhubaneswar-751001.
Khurda
Odisha
4. Regional Manager (CPIO), State Bank of India, Balasore
Bose Colony, O.T Road, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
5. RESUME-2 EXCEL CONSULTATIONS PVT. LTD., Being represented by its Authorised Signatory, Noida
E-14B, 1st Floor, Sector-8, Uttar Pradesh-201301.
Uttar Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps No.1 to 4 is also absent, no steps filed. O.P No.5 is also absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 to 4 were appeared & filed w/v and the O.P No.5 was set exparte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 10.07.19 to till today except 20.12.21, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.