STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD V/S SHYAMSUNDER MAHADEV KARPE - Consumer Court Case

NCDRC

RP/458/2010

SHYAMSUNDER MAHADEV KARPE - Complainant(s)

Versus

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD - Opp.Party(s)

MR. VISHAAL S. JOGDAND

10 Feb 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 21 Jan 2010
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/458/2010
(Against the Order dated 23/09/2009 in Appeal No. 943/2005 of the State Commission Maharastra)

1. SHYAMSUNDER MAHADEV KARPER/at Jawalban, Tq. KaijBeed(Maharashtra)						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. STATE BANK OF HYDERABADAdministrator, State Bank of Hyderabad, Main BranchBeed(Maharashtra)						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,MEMBER

For the Appellant :

NEMO

For the Respondent :

NEMO

Dated : 10 Feb 2010

ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard counsel for the petitioner. The opposite party had not filed written statement before the District Forum and the claim of the petitioner-complainant was allowed. In appeal filed by the opposite party, the State Commission set aside the order of the District Forum but instead of compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-, compensation of Rs.2,000/- was awarded. -2- The matter arose out of rejection of tender filed by the complainant and we fail to understand as to how the complainant would qualify to be a consumer within the definition of Consumer under Section 2 (I) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Be that as it may, we do not find that there is any case for interference in the impugned order passed by the State Commission. Revision petition is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

......................JK.S. GUPTAPRESIDING MEMBER
......................JR.K. BATTAMEMBER