Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/58/2019

C. Baboo Joseph, - Complainant(s)

Versus

State Bank of Hyderabad, - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON

04 Jan 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/58/2019
( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/01/2019 in Case No. CC/05/2015 of District North Chennai)
 
1. C. Baboo Joseph,
Former Trustee Finance (2013-2014), Madras Marthoma Syrian Church, Perambur, Chennai-600 011.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. State Bank of Hyderabad,
By its Manager, Chetpet, Chenna-600 031.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                    BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                       Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                            ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 58/2019

  (Against the order in C.C. No.5/2015  dated 2.1.2019 on the file of the DCDRC, Chennai(North)

                                                      DATED THIS THE 4TH  DAY OF JANUARY 2023

 

C.Baboo Joseph,

Former Trustee Finance (2013-2014),

Madras Marthoma Syrian Church,

Old No.18C, First Street,

Bharathi Road, Perambur,

Chennai – 600 011                                     ..Appellant/Complainant

 

                                           Vs

 

State Bank of Hyderabad,

By its Manager,

16th Avenue, Harrington Road,

Chetpet, Chennai 600 031                          ..Respondent/opposite party

 

For the Appellant/Complainant                   : Party in person

Respondent                                             : Served Called absent

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                Docket order

          No representation for appellant/party in person.  Respondent served called absent. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant in person and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the appellant in person was not present  hence,  passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant in person has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant in person is not interested in prosecuting the case.  Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                             Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                    R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                                 PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.