Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/17/2017

C.Muthusamy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Standard Chartered Bank Rep. by its Manager & 2 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

A. Rajendra Kumar

29 Sep 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.17/2017

                                                            DATED THE 29^TH  DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

C. Muthusamy,

S/o. Mr. Chinnasamy,

Sterling Dwarakamaye Apartments,

Flat No.S1, 2^nd Floor,

No.56, Giri Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.                                                                                                             .. Complainant.

-Versus-

1. Standard Chartered Bank,

(Credit Card Division),

Customer Care Unit,

Represented by its Manager,

No.19, Rajaji Salai,

Chennai – 600 001.

 

2. M/s. Shaha Finlease Private Ltd.,

Rep. by its Authorised Signatory,

Having Office at:-

Plot No.17/9, MIDC Taloja,

Tal Panvel,

Raigad District,

Navi Mumbai – 410 208.

 

3. Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd.,

Represented by is Authorised Signatory,

Heochst House, 6^th Floor,

No.193, Backbay Reclamation,

Nariman Point,

Mumbai – 400 021.                                                                                                              .. Opposite Parties.

Counsel for the complainant                  : M/s. A. Rajendrakumar

Counsel for the 1^st opposite party          : M/s. R & P Partners

Counsel for the 3^rd opposite party         : M/s. S. Parthasarathy

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 29.09.2021 for appearance of both, for filing proof affidavit of complainant and 3^rd opposite party or for dismissal and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                    

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant.  Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both and for filing proof affidavit of complainant or for dismissal.   When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for complainant.   Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M. the complainant was again not present, proof affidavit also not filed.  Since the complainant is not interest in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.   No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                                   Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                       R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                                           PRESIDENT