Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/294/2014

UNIVERCELL TELECOMMUNICATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, AUTHORISED SIGNATORY - Complainant(s)

Versus

SRINIVASAN - Opp.Party(s)

R. GOPI

25 Oct 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

              BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                      Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.294/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.263/2012, dated:19.02.2013 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Coimbatore)

                                                            DATED THE 25^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

1. M/s Univercell Telecommunication India Private Limited,.        

   Branch Office,

   Rep by its Authorised Signatory,

   P.C.G.P/10809,

   100 Feet Road, Gandhipuram

   Coimbatore – 641 012.

 

2. M/s. Univercell Telecommunication India Private Limited,

    Corporate Office,

    Rep. by its Authorised Officer,

    No.281, T.T.K. Road,

    Alwarpet,

    Chennai – 600 018.

                                                                                    .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

 

-Versus-

Mr. Srinivasan, S/o. K. Paramasivam,

D.No.148, Sami Iyer Street,

Coimbatore- 641 001.                                                     .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for the Appellants / Opposite parties  : M/s. R. Gopi

Counsel for the Respondent  / Complainant     : Sd called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 25.10.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order:-                                                                                                

Docket order

 

            No representation for Appellant.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments or for dismissal. When this matter was called at 11.00 A.M., there is no representation for the Appellant.   Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.00 Noon, but the Appellant was again not present. Since, the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                    Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                               R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT