Karnataka

Mandya

CC/08/101

Sri.Benjamin Vas - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri.Pastor S.Paul Raj - Opp.Party(s)

Inperson

03 Oct 2008

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
No.2083/1, Subhash Nagar, 1st Cross, Mandya-571401
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/101

Sri.Benjamin Vas		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Sri.Pastor S.Paul Raj		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant is absent. Nobody to report. Perused the complaint avarements. The transaction of supply of 500 Kgs coffee seeds, 500 fitra of honey & 100 Kg of Ccardamum as for business purpose and pleaded that for livelyhood domestic purpose he looked for supply and further non-payment of money for supply of books amount become deficiency in service defined under CP Act. so the complaint is not maintainable under CP Act. Hence, complaint is not admitted and hence rejected.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda