Karnataka

Mandya

CC/10/22

Sri.D.N.Siddaraju - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri.M.K.Sampath Kumar - Opp.Party(s)

Sri.Hanumanthaiah

26 Feb 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
D.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/22

Sri.D.N.Siddaraju
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Sri.M.K.Sampath Kumar
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Sri.Hanumanthaiah

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Perused the complainant averments and documents. Seeking astrology on payment of consideration does not come into the deficiency in service consumer giving Astrological opinion is a prediction and not a service recgonised by any law. So astological advise does not come under any kind of service or unfair trade practice defined in Consumer Protection Act. Hence, Complaint is not maintainable and hence we proceed to pass the following order. Complaint is not admitted and dismissed as not maintainable.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara
......................Sri.Siddegowda