DATE OF FILING                    :     27-11-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      07-01-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     29-08-2014.  

Smt. Kankana Das,

wife of late Jaladhar Das,

residing at 67/2, Baishnab Para Lane, P.S. Shibpur,

District – Howrah,

represented by her daughter as the constituted attorney

Smt. Papiya Das, daughther of late Jaladar Das,

residing at 67/2, Baishnab Para Lane, P.S. Shibpur,

District – Howrah. ------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

-          Versus   -

Sri  Shyamal Mitra,

son of Sri Biswanath Mitra,

residing at 31/5/2, Ramzi Hazra lane, P.S.  Shibpur,

District -  Howrah,

PIN  – 711102.-----------------------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTY.

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

1.               The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.p. to complete the pending works and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 80,000/- and  Rs. 10,000/- as litigation costs as the o.p. in violation of the development agreement dated 01-01-2009 did not complete the two flats measuring 350 sq. ft. in the 1^st floor of the newly constructed building and did not pay Rs. 1 lakh as per the agreement. 

2.               In spite of service of proper notice, the o.p. did not file any written version. So the case was heard ex parte.

3.        Two points require to be determined namely 1 & 2 :

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.P.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

4.               Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. From the enclosures it appears that the complainant is the absolute owner of the landed property measuring about 1 cottah 7 chittaks 9 Sq. ft. situated at municipal holding no. 19/2, Baishnab Para Lane, P.S.  Shibpur,  District – Howrah. As per agreement the o.p. as promoter / developer assured the complainant, a widow, to provide two flats together with Rs. 1 lakh.  The o.p. turned a deaf ear to the repeated requests of the complainant. Therefore, it appears to be a fit case where the prayer of the complainant shall be allowed ex parte. Both the points are accordingly disposed of.         

      Hence,

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

      That the C. C. Case No.412  of 2013 ( HDF 412 of 2013 )  be  and the same is  allowed  ex parte with  costs  against  the O.P. 

      The O.P. be directed to deliver the complainant two complete the flats measuring 350 sq. ft. as per agreement and to pay Rs. 1 lakh within 30 days from the date of this order

      The o.p. do further  pay a compensation of Rs. 50,000/- for  causing mental pain and prolonged harassment together with litigation costs of  Rs. 5,000/-.

            The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.