West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/8

SRI. RANJAY SHAW - Complainant(s)

Versus

SRI. SHYAM CHOWDHURY - Opp.Party(s)

27 Jun 2013

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/8
 
1. SRI. RANJAY SHAW
S/O- Sri Andul Shaw, 27, Abhoy Guha Road, P.O.- Liluah, P.S.- Bally, Howrah-711 204.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SRI. SHYAM CHOWDHURY
24/1, Abhoy Guha Road, P.O.- Liluah, P.S.- Bally, Howrah-711 204.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :      15-01-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      11-02-2013.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     27-06-2013.  

 

Sri Ranjay Shaw,

s/o. Sri Anal Shaw,

residing at 27, Abhoy  Guha Road, P.O. Liluah,

P.S. Bally, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711204.-------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

 

-          Versus   -

 

1.      Sri Shyam Chowdhury,

2.      Sri Goutam  Chowdhury,

3.      Sri Gopal Chowdhury,

4.      Sri Panchu  Chowdhury,

5.      Smt. Manu Devi,

all are residing at

24/1, Abhoy Guha Road, P.O. Liluah,

P.S. Bally, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711 204.

6.      Sri Raj Kumar Mishra,

7.      M/S. Neel Kanth  Abasan Pvt. Ltd.

represented by its Directors

 

8.      Smt. Anjali Mishra,

9.      Sri Sourav Singh,

10.  Sri Palash Acharya, -----------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                         

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

 

1.                  The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986

wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.ps. to deliver possession of the flat mentioned in ‘B’ Schedule and to execute and register the deed of conveyance with respect to the same, to pay compensation and litigation costs as the O.Ps. in spite of the agreement dated 24-11-2011 and receiving Rs. 14,85,000/-, Rs. 77,000/- in excess of the agreed amount of Rs. 14,08,000/- did not deliver possession of the same and execute the deed of conveyance with respect to the flat.

 

2.                  The o.ps. in their  written version contended interalia that the complainant only

paid Rs. 9,22,000/- on different dates out of the total consideration money of Rs. 14,08,000/- ; that the complainant did not comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement.  So the complaint should be dismissed.

 

 

 

3.         Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is are  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ?

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

 

4.      Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. On scrutiny of the

enclosures it appears that the complainant only paid Rs. 9,22,000/- on different dates from 12-10-2011 till 28-09-2012. We trace no other money receipts to justify the claim of the complainant that he paid Rs. 14,85,000/- i.e., Rs. 77,000/- in excess to that of the agreed amount. Naturally this claim of the complainant is just myth and not supported by any cogent documents.

 

5.      However, since the agreement dated 24-11-2011 stands and the O.P. is in the

receipt of Rs. 9,22,000/- from the complainant towards the consideration money, it is the duty of the O.P. to deliver possession of the same flat and to execute and register the deed of conveyance thereto.

Accordingly both the points are disposed of.

 

      Hence,                             

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

     

      That the C. C. Case No. 8 of 2013 ( HDF 8 of 2013 )  be and the same is allowed on contest against the O.Ps. but without costs.   

 

      The O.Ps. be directed to  deliver possession of the ‘B’ schedule flat to the complainant and execute the sale deed with respect to the same within 45 days from the date of this order after receiving the balance amount of Rs. 4,86,000/-.

     

      The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

       

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

     

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.

  

 

                                                                   

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                               (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.                                   President, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 

 

 

                                                          

 (  Jhumki Saha  )                                                              (  P. K. Chatterjee )

 Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.                                       Member,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.