Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/525/08

Ms Kusalava Finance Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri. P. Purandara Babu - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. A. P. Venu Gopal

24 Jan 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/525/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Chittoor-II at triputi)
 
1. Ms Kusalava Finance Ltd.
D.No.40-1-10, Labbipet, M.G. Road, Vijayawada.
Vijayawada
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri. P. Purandara Babu
16-1-56, Netaji Road, Tiruapthi, Chittor Dist.
Chittor
Andhra Pradesh
2. Mr. Chitti Babu
N.R.Auto Consultants, D.No.13/6/616/13/16, P.K. Layout, Tirupathi.
Titupathi
Andhra Pradesh
3. Ms Kusalava Finance Ltd.
D.No.13/6/6, P.K. Layout, Tirupathi.
Tirupathi
Andhra Pradesh
4. N. Redanna
N.R.Auto Consultants, D.No.13/6/616/13/16, P.K. Layout, Tirupathi.
Andhra Pradesh
5. Sri. V.V. Ratnam
N.R.Auto Consultants, D.No.13/6/616/13/16, P.K. Layout, Tirupathi.
Tirupathi
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.525 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C.No.66 OF 2007 DISTRICT FORUM-II, AT TIRUPATHI

Between:

M/s Kusalava Finance Ltd.,
Rep. by its Manager Sri K.Koteswara Rao

D.No.40-1-10, Labbipet, M.G.Road,
Vijayawada
       

                                                       

A N D

 

1.                         Netaji Road, Tirupathi, Chittor District

                                                       2.                  3.           

4.    

5.           

(Respondent Nos.3 to 5 are working at
 N.R.Auto Consultants, D.No.13/6/616/13/16
P.K.Layout, tirupathi

 

                                               

                                                       

Counsel for the Appellant            

Counsel for the Respondents        

       

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

.

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY,

TWO THOUSAND ELEVAN

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                       1.     `83,000/- on hypothecation agreement with the opposite party no.1 for the finance to an extent of`50,000/-.   `7000/- towards full and final settlement of his loan account was dishonored for insufficient funds in his account.  

2.    `1,07,850/- to SM Cars, Chennai and the opposite parties instead of a sum of`92,000/- and as such he had demanded for the refund of excess amount besides for furnishing of no objection certificate and on failure of the opposite party to meet his demand, he had issued notice dated 27.3.2007 alleging deficiency in service on their part. 

3.     

4.     Vijayawada 

5.     

6.    `211/- with interest @ 9% per annum against the opposite party no.1 and directed it to issue no objection certificate besides`500/- towards costs.

7.    

8.    

9.         

10.   

       11.      Jurisdiction of the District Forum.—(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the District Forum shall have jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services and the compensation, if any, claimed ''does not exceed rupees(2)  

(a)    the opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works for gain, or

(b)    any of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business or has a branch office, or personally works for gain, provided that in such case either the permission of the District Forum is given, or the opposite parties who do not reside, or carry on business or have a branch office, or personally work for gain, as the case may be, acquiesce in such institution; or

(c)    the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. 

 

11.    

Therefore, any question relating to the jurisdiction aspect pales into insignificance particularly in relation to the opposite party no.2 as the cause of action or part of cause of action would confer jurisdiction on the District Forum. 

12.    `50,000/- and got the complainant entered the hypothecation agreement with it and collected documentation charges, interest and commission as also penal interest on delayed payment of installments.     

        `2,000/-. 

 

 

                                                                                

 

                                                                                                                                                       

KMK*

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.