West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/110

SRI. SUDAMA RAM - Complainant(s)

Versus

SRI. HIRALAL SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

31 Dec 2013

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 1.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/110
 
1. SRI. SUDAMA RAM
S/O- Late Nanka Ram, 31/1/15, Bhujanga Dhar Road, P.S.- Liluah, Howrah-711 204.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SRI. HIRALAL SINGH
S/O- Late Ram Prasad Singh, 31/1/15, Bhujanga Dhar Road, P.S.- Liluah, Howrah-711 204.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    : 12-04-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            : 10-05-2013.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :  31-12-2013.

 

Shri Sudama Ram,

son of late Nanka Ram,

residing at 31/1/15, Bhujanga Dhar  Road,

P.S. Liluah, District – Howrah,

PIN – 711204.---------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

 

-          Versus   -

 

1.      Shri Hira Lal Singh,

son of late Ram Prasad Singh.

 

2.      Smt. Kamal Singh,

wife of Shri Hira Lal Singh,

both residing at 31/1/15, Bhujanga Dhar  Road,

P.S. Liluah, District –Howrah,

PIN  – 711204.-----------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                         

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

 

1.                  The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986

wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.ps. to execute and register proper deed of conveyance with respect to the flat as mentioned in para 6 of the complaint and to pay compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,00,000/- as the O.P. in spite of repeated reminders did not execute the sale deed.

 

2.                  The o.ps. in the written version contended interalia that the complainant is

already in possession of the flat in question and the complaint is not maintainable before this Forum.   

 

3.         Upon pleadings of both parties two points arose for determination :

 

i)          Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

 

 

 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

 

4.      Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. Admittedly the

complainant is in possession of schedule mentioned flat as per agreement dated 25-01-2008. The complainant already paid the entire agreed consideration money to the O.Ps. In spite of the receiving the total consideration money, the O.Ps. have been deliberately delaying  the execution of the sale deed as is reflected from the annexures. We are, therefore, of the view that this a fit case where the prayer of the complainant shall be allowed as there is gross deficiency of service. Both the points are accordingly disposed of.    

 

      Hence,

                       

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

 

           

      That the C. C. Case No.  110 of 2013 ( HDF  110 of 2013 )  be  and the same is allowed on contest with  costs  against  the O.Ps. 

 

      The O.Ps. be directed to execute and register proper sale deed in favour of the complainant with respect to the flat as mentioned in the schedule within 30 days from the date of this order.

     

      The complainant is entitled to a compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- ( one lakh ) from the O.Ps. for causing mental pain and prolonged harassment.

 

      The complainant is  further entitled to a litigation cost of Rs. 5,000/- from the O.Ps.

 

      The O.Ps. to do pay the above amount ( Rs. 1,05,000/- ) to the complainant within 30 days from the date of this order, failing the amount shall carry interest at the rate of 8% per annum till full satisfaction.

 

      The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

       

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

     

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

 

                                                                   

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                               (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.                                   President, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 

 

                                                          

 (  Jhumki Saha  )                                                              (  P. K. Chatterjee )

 Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah.                                       Member,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.