Assam

StateCommission

MA/36/2018

M/S Poddar Car World Pvt. Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Utpaljyoti Choudhury - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. N. Alam

28 Feb 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/36/2018
( Date of Filing : 28 Mar 2018 )
In
First Appeal No. A/21/2018
 
1. M/S Poddar Car World Pvt. Limited
Registered Office and principal Place of business at Khanapara, G. S. Road, Guwahati-22, Represented by its duly authorized Representative, Sri Prithivi Raj Pattnaik
Kamrup(M)
Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Utpaljyoti Choudhury
Sixmile, Puran Basti, A. A. Path, 5th Bye lane, Sewali Path, H. No. 20, Guwahati-22
Kamrup(M)
Assam
2. Mr. Amitabh Dey, General Manager, Sales, Poddar Car World
Khanapara, G. S. Road, Guwahati-22, P.O.- Khanapara
Kamrup(M)
Assam
3. Mr. Ajay Kumar, Tax/Vehicle & Charge Invoice Creator
G. S. Road, Guwahati-22, P.O.- Khanapara
Kamrup(M)
Assam
4. The Regional Head, Guwahati, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Ulubari, P.O.-Ulubari
Kamrup(M)
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Dr. Indira Shah PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. K. Jain,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. N. Alam, Advocate for
For the Respondent: Mr. R. K. Jain, Advocate
Dated : 28 Feb 2020
Final Order / Judgement

           Heard Mr. K. Jain, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Utpaljyoti Choudhury, respondent No. 1, appearing in person and Mr. R. K. Jain, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 4.

         This is an application for condoning the delay of 175 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. Respondent No. 1 and learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 have fairly submitted that they have no objection if the delay is condoned. The grounds for delay has been explained in the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath in the application and to meet the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

        Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Dr. Indira Shah]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.