Tripura

StateCommission

F.A 30/2014

The Prop. MS Anjali Pollution Testing Center - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Sunil Das - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. A.L Saha, Mr. A.Saha, Mr. K.Nandi

30 Mar 2015

ORDER

The learned counsel Mr.K.Nandi is present for the appellant. None appears for the respondent. It transpires that this Commission vide previous order dated 23.03.2015 directed the parties to remain present for the disposal of this appeal on the basis of the affidavit-cum-declaration submitted from the side of the parties to this appeal as submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant. Now Mr. Nandi submits that as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the appellant is not willing to appear in this appeal. He also submits that in view of the above position, the affidavit-cum-declaration submitted earlier for the disposal of this appeal may be rejected and the appeal may be dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.

        In this case, the respondent is also not appearing. Neither the appellant nor the respondent is coming to get this appeal disposed of on the basis of this said affidavit-cum-declaration. In the circumstances, we find no other ground to drag this appeal any more. As submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant, the affidavit-cum-declaration filed on 12.03.2015 not being pursued is rejected and the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution as submitted. 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.