Iswar Chandra Sahu filed a consumer case on 03 Jan 2018 against Sri Sudam Charan Sahu in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/16/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 19 Mar 2018.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 16/ 2017. Date. 12 .1. 2018.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri GadadharaSahu, . Member.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, Member
Iswar Chandra Sahu, S/O : Late Simanchal Sahu, At : Block colony, C/O: Balaram Choudhari, B.M., SBI, Rayagada, Po/Dist.Rayagada,State: Odisha. Pin no. 765 001. Cell No. 9437372299. …….Complainant
Vrs.
The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, At/Po: Laxmipur, Dist:Koraput. .…..Opp.Parties
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: - Self..
For the O.Ps :- Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.
J u d g e m e n t.
The present disputes emerges out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non refund of deposited amount a sum of Rs..11,694/- towards health insurance. The brief facts of the case has summarised here under.
That the complainant is having S.B. account No. 054501000004708 with the bank of O.P. and the O.P. is having their insurance i.e. Health Care INS and the O.P is also an agent of the said insurance in addition to his own work. The O.P. has deducted a sum of Rs.5,847/- in the month of January, 2016 and being asked he stated that the policy documents will be received against the said deposit but till date there is no such intimation about the policy condition. Again the O.P. has deducted a further sum of Rs. 5,487/- on Dt.19.8.2016. But till date the complainant has not received the policy document. Hence this case. The complainant prays the forum direct the O.Ps to refund the deposited amounts a sum of Rs.11,694/- with interest and such other relief as the hon’ble forum deems fit and proper for the best interest of justice.
On being noticed the O.P filed written version through their learned counsel and contended that the averments made by the complainant in the complaint may be considered to have been rebutted and denied unless specifically admitted herein after. The O.Ps taking other grounds in the written version sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable under the C.P. Act, 1986. It is therefore prayed the forum to dismiss the complaint petition against the O.P. with exemplary costs.
The O.Ps appeared and filed their written version. Heard arguments from the learned counsel for the O.P. and complainant. Perused the record, documents, written version filed by the parties.
Both the parties advanced arguments vehemently touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
FINDINGS.
On perusal of the record it is revealed that the complainant is having S.B. account bearing No. 054501000004708 in the O.P.(Bank ).
On perusal of the record it is revealed that the O.P. in their written version clearly contended that the hon’ble Forum has got no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the above complaint petition and also to hear the same since the complainant is the resident of Laxmipur, Dist: Koraput.
Section 11(2)© of the C.P. Act, 1986 has made it specific that a complaint shall be instituted in a District Forum with in the local limits of whose jurisdiction the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises. The present case in hand it is revealed that the complainant is having S.B. account bearing No. 054501000004708 in the O.P.(Bank ) at Laximpur which is comes under the purview of the territorial jurisdiction of the Dist. Consumer Forum, at Koraput, State: Odisha.. For redressal of grievance the complainant should file the above case before the Koraput District Consumer Forum where the cause of action arose and she can agitate her grievance for its redressal . In view of the above discussion this forum dismissed the complaint petition. We do not think proper to go into merit of this case. The complainant have no fate other then dismiss.
Further the complaint petition is bad for non joinder of necessary party i.e. Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. has not been added as the party in the present case.
So to meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.
ORDER.
In resultant the complaint petition is hereby stands dismissed. The complainant is free to approach the court of competent having its jurisdiction. Parties are left to bear their own cost. Accordingly the case is closed.
Dictated and corrected by me
prononunced on this 12th. Day of January, 2018.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.