Tripura

West Tripura

CC/16/2023

Smti. Nabanita Das. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Subhradeep Majumder, Prop. of Paradise Construction. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.P.K.Chakraborty

17 Feb 2024

ORDER

 
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALA
 
CASE   NO:   CC- 16  of   2023
 
Smt.  Nabanita Das,
W/O- Sri Himadri Deb,
Ward No. 11, Gobindapur,
(near Gobindapur S.B. School),
P.O. & P.S. Kailashahar, 
District- Unakoti,
Tripura, Pin- 799277. ..…............Complainant.
 
-VERSUS-
 
Sri Subhradeep Majumder,
Proprietor of “ Paradise Construction”
S/O- Sri Babul Kanti Majumder,
Kunjaban, Circuit House, 
P.O. - Kunjaban, P.S. NCC,
District- West Tripura- 799006. ...........Opposite Party.
 
 
    __________PRESENT__________
 
 SRI GOUTAM DEBNATH
PRESIDENT,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER  
DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
      WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA. 
 
DR (SMT) BINDU PAL
MEMBER,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER 
DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 
  WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA.
 
SRI SAMIR GUPTA
MEMBER,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER  DISPUTES  
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA. 
 
 
C O U N S E L
 
For the Complainant : Sri Prabir Kumar Chakraborty,
Learned Advocate.          
 
For the O.P. : Exparte.
 
 
ORDER  DELIVERED  ON:   17.02.2024.
F I N A L    O R D E R
1. This is filed U/S 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by Smt. Nabanita Das of Kailashahar, Unakoti, Tripura against the O.P. namely Sri Subhradeep Majumder of Kunjaban, Circuit House, West Tripura alleging deficiency in service on the part of the O.P.
1.1 The case in short is that the complainant for purchasing a 2BHK flat at Mouja- Agartala Sheet, No.13, Teheshil- Agartala East at a consideration of Rs.30,00000/-  entered into an agreement dated 15, July, 2019 with the O.P. and advanced an amount of Rs.8,01,000/- in two strokes out of the total consideration. Thereafter the rest amount to be payable @ Rs.4,00,000/- before completion /handing over the flat to the complainant  in 5 phases.  
1.2 Since the complainant noticed that the construction was not completed she requested to refund the entire advanced amount against the booking of the flat which the O.P. agreed to pay and paid Rs. 1,60,000/- thereafter stopped payment of the balance quantum of money.
1.3 Several persuasions and requests were made to the O.P. for refund of the balance amount but the did not pay the rest amount of Rs.6,41,000/-.
1.4 Advocate's Notice also sent on 01.12.2022 but to no good. 
1.5 Hence, the complainant filed this case before this Commission for getting refund of the advanced amount of Rs.6,41,000/- along with 7% interest and compensation of Rs.1,20,000/-.
2. The O.P. appeared but ultimately failed to submit evidence inspite of repeated chance hence, vide order dated 20.01.2024 the case has been proceeding exparte against the O.P.
 
 
3. The complainant submitted evidence and documents like agreement with the O.P., money receipts. 
 
4. Hearing argument the following point is taken up for discussion and decision:-
(I) Whether the complainant is entitled to get refund of any amount from th O.P. and if so, to what extent, any other relief the complainant is entitled to?
 
DECISION  AND  REASON:-
5. The complainant has proved by submitting documents i.e., money receipt that she advanced Rs.8,01,000/- in 2 strokes out of the total amount of Rs.30,00,000/- for purchasing the flat from the O.P. the O.P. did not hand over the flat and on repeated persuasion refunded Rs.1,60,000/- to the complainant. The rest amount of Rs.6,41,000/- is still remaining with the O.P. The O.P. is guilty of deficiency in service and liable to pay the rest amount with interest and also liable to pay compensation.
 
6. In the result, considering the extent of negligent and nature of negligent we order that the O.P. shall refund the rest amount of Rs.6,41,000/- with interest @ 7.5% from 15.07.2019 i.e., the last stroke of payment of installment till the date of actual payment with compensation for a further sum of Rs.20,000/- which is inclusive of litigation cost.
7. The case stands disposed of.
8. Supply copy of this Final order free of cost to the  complainant and the O.P.
 
Announced.
 
 
 
SRI  GOUTAM DEBNATH
PRESIDENT,
DISTRICT CONSUMER  DISPUTES 
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA
 
 
 
 
DR (SMT)  BINDU  PAL
MEMBER, 
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES 
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 
WEST TRIPURA,AGARTALA
 
 
 
SRI SAMIR  GUPTA
MEMBER,
 DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES  
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,AGARTALA.
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.