Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/36/2021

Sri Ajay Kumar Das, aged about 78 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Satyajit Rout, aged 43 years, Block Development Officer, Bhograi - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Ghanashyam Sahu & Others

30 Apr 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/36/2021
( Date of Filing : 05 Aug 2021 )
 
1. Sri Ajay Kumar Das, aged about 78 years
S/o. Sri Rajendra Das, At- Demuria, P.O- Dahunda, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. Sri Rajendra Das, aged about 96 years
S/o. Late Chintamani Das, At- Demuria, P.O- Dahunda, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Satyajit Rout, aged 43 years, Block Development Officer, Bhograi
At/P.O- Jaleswarpur, P.S- Bhograi, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. SURAVI SHUR MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sri Ghanashyam Sahu & Others, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sri Ghanashyam Sahu & Others, Advocate for the Complainant 2
 
Dated : 30 Apr 2022
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The Advocate for Complainants is present and files hazira. O.P is absent, no step filed. Heard from the Complainants regarding the history of Case. Thereafter, the total case filed is meticulously perused. It is observed that the case was filled on dated: 05.08.2021 and was admitted U/s. 36 (3) of C.P Act-2019 under the provision of deemed admissibility. This deemed admission was due to non-availability of Coram of this Commission. Consequent to this deemed admission, notice was sent to the O.P for their stand.

                                         However, on further verification of the complaint petition, prayer and annexures, it is observed that, this is a dispute between the Complainant No.2 and Govt. represented through the B.D.O, Bhograi for availing of Biju Pucca Ghar Yojana under Govt. beneficiary scheme.

                                         That, under the beneficiary scheme, the Complainant No.2 is a recipient of the benefit of free Pucca Ghar, without any consideration to Govt. in any mode, as laid down in the C.P Act-2019.

                                         As per the definition of a Consumer U/s. 2 (7) of C.P Act-2019, a person becomes a “Consumer” for receipt of goods / services for a consideration be it full, part or promised to pay. Here, the Complainant No.2 for availing the beneficiary scheme for construction of house under “Biju Pucca Ghar Yojana”, does not require to pay any consideration under any mode. Hence, the Complainants / Petitioners are not Consumers under the purview and ambit of the C.P Act-2019.

                                         That, as the present case does not come under the purview and ambit of the C.P Act-2019, as aforesaid is hereby dismissed on merit.

                                         The notice served to O.P is hereby made infructuous. Issue extract order of the same to both the Parties for their information.

                                         Pronounced in this open District Commission on 30th April, 2022 given under my signature and seal of this District Commission.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. SURAVI SHUR]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.