DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.
M.A. 78/2021
Arising out of C. C. NO. 212/2018
Date of Filing: Date of Disposal
24.11.2021 24.11.2021
Complainants(s):- -Vs- O.P(s):-
Sri Samir Kumar Dey, 1.Sri Sandip Pramanik,
S/o. Late Kashinath Dey, S/o. Sri Shakti Pramanik,
Jemes Office/ Military Engg. East Rabindrapally, Krishnapur,
Babistha, Dist- Kamrup, (Assam), P.S. Baguiati,
Guwahati-29 presently residing at P.O. Prafullakanan,
‘Ganapati Apartment, AE-23, Flat No.2, Dist- North 24 Pgs, Kol-101.
3rd floor, Rabindrapally, P.O. Prafulla Kanan, 2. Sri Pranadip Pramanik,
Kolkata-700101, Dist- North 24 Pgs. S/o. Sri Swapan Kr. Pramanik
of Nayapatti, P.S. Salt Lake,
East, Dist- North 24 Pgs.
3. M/s. Ganapati Construction
2/2, Nirmal Chandra Street,
Kolkata-12
and also at AE-23, Flat No.2
on 3rd floor, Rabindrapally,
P.O. Prafullya Kanan,
Kol-101, Dist- North 24 Pgs
by its partners O.P. Nos.4 to8
4.Mrs. Meena Jaiswal,
W/o. Rajesh Kr. Jaiswal.
5.Mr. Sonu Jaiswal
@ Aman Jaiswal,
S/o. Late Rajesh Kr. Jaiswal,
6.Mrs. Sweeti Jaiswal
@Priya Jaiswal,
D/o. Late Rajesh Kr. Jaiswal
All are residing at AE-6,
Flat Rabindrapally,
P.O. Prafulla Kanan,
P.S. Baguiati, Kolkata-101,
Dist- North 24 Pgs.
Contd/-2
M.A. 78/2021
Arising out of E.A. No. 212/2018
:: 2 ::
7. Rupan Paul,
S/o. Late Monoranjan Paul,
R.N. Avenue, P.O. Pansila,
Dist- North 24 Pgs, Kol-112,
2/2, Nirmal Chandra Street,
Kolkata- 700012.
8. Om Prakash Sarswa,
S/o. Hiralal Sarswa,
21, Rose Merry Lane,
Howrah-711001 and also
at 2/2, Nirmal Chandra St.,
Kolkata- 700012.
R E S E N T :- Smt. Sukla Sengupta…………………President
:- Smt. Monisha Shaw…………………Member
:- Sri Susmit Hrishikesh Bhattachary…Member
Order No. 15
The complainant is present and files hazira. O.P. Nos. 3,4,5 and 6 are also present by filing hazira. Ld. Advocate for the complainant files a petition on
02.09.2021 under order No. 5 Rule 20 , CPC with a prayer for allowing him to serve the notice upon the O.P. Nos. 1,2,7 and 8 through paper publication.
Let the petition dated 02.09.2021 under Order No. 5 Rule 20, CPC filed the complainant be treated as M.A. No. 78/2021.
Perused the petition. Heard both sides. Considered. No objection raised from any corner. From the materials on record it appears that since long the complainant could not be able to serve the notice upon the O.P. Nos. 1,2,7 and 8 as mentioned in the petition dated 02.09.2021 due to faulty address.
Hence, considering this circumstance this commission do not find any predicament to allow this petition.
Contd/-3
M.A. 78/2021
Arising out of E.A. No. 212/2018
:: 3 ::
Hence,
Ordered
that the petition dated 02.09.2021under order 5 rule 20, CPC filed by the complainant is considered and allowed and the complainant is permitted to serve the notice through paper publication in a well circulated daily newspaper.
Fixing by 10.01.2022 for compliance report along with copy of the daily newspaper by the complainant.
The M.A. being No. 78/2021 is thus disposed of.
Dictated and corrected by me.
President
Member Member President
