HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ISHAN CHANDRA DAS,PRESIDENT

             Heard ld.Advocate for the Revisionist moving  the Revisional Application  filed against the order no.3 dated 2.3.2021 passed in C.C.25 of 2021 pending before  ld. D.C.D.R.Commission, Unit I. The Revisional Application is  filed within the  prescribed  time.

           Questioning propriety of the said order dated 2.3.2021,  this Revisional Application has been filed by the Opposite Party of C.C. 25 of 2021 wherein by the said order  ld. D.C.D.R.Commission fixed a date for exparte hearing of the case in exclusion of the Opposite party from contesting the Complaint case, though a notice was served upon the OP NO.1 as it is revealed from the Advocate’s letter dated 24.2.2021 (page 43 of the file) .

          Ld. Counsel appearing for the Revisionist submitted that his client should be given an opportunity to contest the complaint  proceeding ( CC/25/2021) by filing Written version and evidence according to the procedure prescribed by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. It appears to us that ld. D.C.D.R.Commission fixed the date of exparte hearing of the case hurriedly without obtaining service report against all the Opposite parties. Hence, we admit the Revisional Application and dispose of it exparte, by allowing it in part for the end of justice  and direct  ld. D.C.D.R.Commission to allow time to the Revisionist to file Written Version and to contest the Complaint case according to law. The order of interim injunction passed by ld. D.C.D.R.Commission, a part of  the order impugned remains uninterfered and ld. D.C.D.R.Commission is at liberty to deal with the matter of injunction according to its own wisdom  and obviously accordingly to law.

         The Revisional Petition is thus admitted and  disposed of.