Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/247

Arjun singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri sai some education ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

07 Jun 2017

ORDER

                                               

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D.O.O- 07.06.2017

Present :-          None for complainant.

                    Ms. Sunanda Nimisha advocate for Ops-2 and 3.

                    OP-1 ex-parte.

                    Complainant failed to file rejoinder and evidence by way of affidavit and pay conditional cost of Rs.500/-(Rs. Five Hundred). Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant to pay conditional cost of Rs.500/-(Rs. Five Hundred) despite demand. It is already 03.20 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. It seems that Complainant is not interested in prosecution of Complaint.

Therefore, this forum has no option except to dismiss the Complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the Complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

Copy of order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.   

 

 

(PUNEET LAMBA)                                                                          ( R.S.  BAGRI )

                 MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT

                    07.06.2017                                                                                                               07.06.2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.