Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/104/2017

P.Sreevalli - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri sai constructions rep by its Prop.P.R.Gopinath & anr - Opp.Party(s)

S.P.Elango-complt

29 Mar 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

           BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 104/2017

                                                               DATED THIS THE 29^th  DAY MARCH 2023

 

Mrs.Sreevalli Alias Ranjitha,

W/o Major.R.R.Menon,

Flat No.F-3, Jains Anahita Apartments,

No.9, 1^st Cross street, Lake Area,

Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034

Rep.by her power of Attorney Holder,

Mr. P.Ramakrushna Aliar Ashokkumar                           ..Complainant

                                                     Vs

 

1. M/s Sri Sai Constructions,

Represented by its Prop.Mr.P.R.Gopinath,

S/o Late P.M.Ramachandran,

Having office at

No.5-A, Kalaignar Karunanidhi Road,

Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093  

 

2. P.R.Gopinath,

S/o Late.P.M.Ramachandran,

No.5-A, Kalaignar Karunanidhi Road,

Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093                                ..Opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Complainant                            : M/s Vijay Anand

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2              : M/s K.Balaji

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                               

                                                  Docket order

 

          No representation for both. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for filing written arguments of opposite parties and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present. Hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

  Sd/-                                                                                                 Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                    R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                    PRESIDENT