| Complaint Case No. CC/84/2021 | | ( Date of Filing : 22 Nov 2021 ) |
| | | | 1. SRI SUJIT KUMAR CHAKRABORTI | | S/O SUSHIL CHAKRABORTY,R/O NIVEDITA ROAD BYE LANE,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | 2. SMT DEBOLINA CHAKRABORTY | | W/O SRI SUJIT KUMAR CHAKRABORTY,R/O NIVEDITA ROAD,BYE LANE,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR ,734003 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. SRI MRINAL KANTI NATH | | S/O LATE TEJENDRA LAL NATH,R/O B.B.D COLONY,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | W.B | | 2. SRI NIHAR KANTI NATH | | S/O LATE TEJENDRA LAL NATH,R/O B.B.D COLONY,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 3. SMT SWAPNA DUTTA NEE NATH | | W/O ADHIR DUTTA,R/O 2/4 BAGHAJATIN COLONY,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | 4. SMT RATNA SEN NEE NATH | | W/O SRI SUBRATA SEN,R/O STREET NO 55,AREA 1,CHITTARANJAN,P.O AND P.S CHITTARANJAN,713331 | | BURDWAN | | WEST BENGAL | | 5. SRI KAUSHIK DASGUPTA | | S/O LATE SUHASH DAS GUPTA,R/O BBD COLONY,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 6. SRI KUNAL DAS GUPTA | | S/O LATE SUHASH DAS GUPTA,R/O BBD COLONY,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 7. SMT PURNALAKSHMI DAS GUPTA | | W/O LATE KALLAL DAS GUPTA,R/O MATIGARA HUT,P.O AND P.S MATIGARA,734010 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 8. MISS SATARUPA DAS GUPTA | | D/O LATE KALLAL DAS GUPTA,R/O MATIGARA HUT,P.O AND P.S MATIGARA 734010 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 9. SMT NEERA CHAKRABORTY | | W/O SRI PRANAB CHAKRABORTY,NO.9,R/O NIVEDITA BT LANE,NEAR RAMKRISHNA ASHRAM,P.O AND P.S PRADHANNAGAR,734003 | | DARJEELING | | WEST BENGAL | | 10. M/S THE JUPITOR,PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED NO L 81298 | | S.N.T GODOWN ROAD,P.O AND P.S PRADHAN NAGAR,SILIGURI | | DARJEELING |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | OP files hazira. Complainant is absent without taking any step. Today is fixed for filing show cause by the complainant. It is now 1.22pm. On repeated calls neither the complainant nor his Ld. advocate is found present. Heard Ld. advocate of the OP. Perused the record. It reveals from the record that the complainant was found absent dated 14.06.2022, 22.06.2022, 17.08.2022, 13.10.2022, 23.11.2022, 15.03.2022, 18.05.2023, 25.05.2023 and today also complainant not appears even he did not file any show cause. Accordingly we are of the view that complainant is not at all interested to proceed with the case. Hence, the case being no. CC- 84 of 2021 is dismissed for non prosecution. | |
