West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/967/2012

M/s. Amarnath Construction - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Jayanta Kumar Nandy - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Rajtilok Ghosal

12 Dec 2013

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
FA No: 967 Of 2012
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/07/2012 in Case No. CC/274/2010 of District Kolkata-II)
 
1. M/s. Amarnath Construction
A partnership firm represented by Smt. Nupur Bose, & Sri Niren Bose, 17, Peshkar Lane, Salkia, P.O. Golabari, Dist. Howrah-711 106.
2. Smt. Nupur Bose
W/o Sri Bholanath Bose, partner of M/s. Amarnath Construction, 17, Peshkar Lane, Salkia, P.O. Golabari, Dist. Howrah-711 106.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Jayanta Kumar Nandy
S/o Sudhir Krishna Nandi, 8, Brindavan Pal Lane, 38/5 Bagbazar Street, P.O. Bagbazar, P.S. Shyampukur, Kolkata - 700 003.
2. Sri Niren Bose
S/o Narendra Kumar Bose, partner M/s. Amarnath Construction, 17, Peshkar Lane, Salkia, P.O. Golabari, Dist. Howrah-711 106.
3. Smt. Santa Banerjee
W/o Amitabha Banerjee, 38/5, Bagbazar Street, P.O. Bagbazar, P.S. Shyampukur, Kolkata - 700 003.
4. Sri Nilotpal Banerjee
S/o Amitabha Banerjee, 38/5, Bagbazar Street, P.O. Bagbazar, P.S. Shyampukur, Kolkata - 700 003.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MRIDULA ROY MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Rajtilok Ghosal , Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Subhrajit Chakraborty, Advocate
 In-Person, Advocate
ORDER

 

 

 

ORDER NO. 7 DT. 12.12.13

HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. KALIDAS MUKHERJEE, PRESIDENT

 

Ld. Advocates for the Appellants and the Respondent No. 1 are present.  Respondent No. 2 is present in person and files BNA.  Ld. Advocate for the Appellants submits that even after necessary correspondences with the Appellant, no instruction is received by him in connection with the Appeal and necessary orders may be passed.

The application for condonation of delay was earlier allowed, vide Order No. 5 dt. 12.9.13, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 2,000/- by the Appellants to the Respondent/ Complainant by 4.12.13.  On 4.12.13 on the prayer of the Ld. Advocate for the Appellants the matter was fixed today for payment of cost as a last chance.  In view of the submission made by the Ld. Advocate for the Appellant, we are not inclined to extend the time-limit for payment of cost.  Under the circumstances, the Appeal being time-barred stands dismissed.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALIDAS MUKHERJEE]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRIDULA ROY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.