West Bengal

StateCommission

A/126/2018

The Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Goutam Das - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Dipak Ranjan Mukherjee, Ms. Mousumi Chakraborty

03 Apr 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/126/2018
( Date of Filing : 07 Feb 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/12/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/154/2015 of District Hooghly)
 
1. The Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
21, Bells House, Kolkata - 700 016.
2. The Br. Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
Chinsurah, Hooghly.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Goutam Das
Lakshmanpara, P.O. & P.S. - Kalna, Dist. Burdwan.
2. The Br. Manager, Axis Bank Ltd.
STKK Road, Kalna, Burdwan.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. Dipak Ranjan Mukherjee, Ms. Mousumi Chakraborty, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Golok Chandra Ghosh., Advocate
Dated : 03 Apr 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

The complaint case since been allowed by the Ld. District Forum, aggrieved with such decision, this Appeal is moved by Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Briefly narrated, case of the Appellants is that based on the mandate form submitted by the Respondent No. 1, they effected due payment to the designated account number through NEFT and therefore, there was no laches on their part.  Accordingly, they prayed for setting aside the impugned order.

It appears from the Postal AD Card that notice of this Appeal was duly served upon the Respondent No. 2. However, as it did not turn up to defend its case before us, at the time of hearing, we heard the submission advanced on behalf of the Ld. Advocates for the Appellant and Respondent No. 1.

It is found from the documents on record that the Respondent No. 1 submitted the NEFT mandate form and other requisite documents through Sri Basudeb Saha and Sri Atindra Saha and further that the proceeds of the concerned policy was transferred to the account of one Smt. Bandana Mondal.  On due consideration of the entire facts and circumstances of this Appeal, it appears to us that for proper adjudication of the dispute, all the aforementioned three accused persons are necessary parties to the case. 

Accordingly, we are inclined to remand the case to the Ld. District Forum for fresh adjudication of the dispute after inclusion of the said persons into the case.

The Appeal, accordingly, stands allowed in part.  The impugned order is hereby set aside.  Parties to appear before the Ld. District Forum on 03-05-2019 for submission of amended petition of complaint.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.