| Miscellaneous Application No. MA/122/2016 | | In | | First Appeal No. A/80/2016 |
| | | | 1. Jet lite (India) Ltd. | | L. G. B. International Airport, Borjhar, Guwahati-15, Dist.-Kamrup, Assam | | 2. Jet Lite (india) Ltd | | C/o Jet Airways (india) Ltd., Jet Air House, 13 Community Centre, Yusuf Sarai, Delhi-49 | | Delhi | | 3. The Vice President, Corporate Communication and Public Relations, Jet Lite (India) Ltd. | | C/o Jet Airways (india) Ltd., Jet Air House, 13 Community Centre, Yusuf Sarai, Delhi-49 | | Delhi |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Sri Dimbo Dhar Das | | S/o Late Basanta Kumar Das, R/o Opp. Bye Lane, Borthakur Clinic, House No. 69, Kharghuli, Guwahati, Dist.-Kamrup, Assam | | 2. Mrs. Krishna Das | | W/o Sri Dimbo Dhar Das, R/o Opp. Bye Lane, Borthakur Clinic, House No. 69, Kharghuli, Guwahati, | | Kamrup | | Assam | | 3. Ms Kakalee Das | | D/o Sri Dimbo Dhar Das, R/o Opp. Bye Lane, Borthakur Clinic, House No. 69, Kharghuli, Guwahati, | | Kamrup | | Assam | | 4. Ms Kangkana Das | | D/o Sri Dimbo Dhar Das, R/o Opp. Bye Lane, Borthakur Clinic, House No. 69, Kharghuli, Guwahati, | | Kamrup | | Assam | | 5. Chairman/Managing Director, Yatra Online Pvt. Ltd. | | B-21, Infocity, Near Hero Honda Chowk, Phase II, Sector 34, Gurgaon-122001 | | Haryana | | 6. The Chief Executive Officer , Yatra Online Pvt. Ltd. | | B-21, Infocity, Near Hero Honda Chowk, Phase II, Sector 34, Gurgaon-122001 | | Haryana |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
|
|
| For the Appellant: | Mr. R. K. Dutta,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. D. Deka, Advocate for | | For the Respondent: | Ms. S. Ahmed,Advocate, for Ms. I. Mazumdar, Advocate | | | Mr. T. Kalita, Advocate | | | Mr. T. Kalita, Advocate | |
| Final Order / Judgement | Heard Mr. R.K. Dutta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. T. Kalita, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6. This is an application for condoning the delay of 25 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. Mr. T. Kalita has filed objection against the application for condoning the delay. We have perused the same. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraph 2 and 9 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraph 2 and 9 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned. Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly. | |
