Assam

StateCommission

MA/90/2015

Assam State Warehousing Corporation - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Chain Sukh Jain, Proprietor, M/S Cement House - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. R. Thakuria

08 Aug 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/90/2015
In
First Appeal No. A/59/2015
 
1. Assam State Warehousing Corporation
Pannyagar Bhawan, Amarabati Path, Christianbasti, Guwahati-5, Dist.-Kamrup, Assam
2. Managing Director, Assam State Warehousing Corporation
Pannyagar Bhawan, Amarabati Path, Christianbasti, Guwahati-5,
Kamrup
Assam
3. Manager, Assam State Warehousing Corporation
Dibrugarh Branch, Dibrugarh
Dibrugarh
Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Chain Sukh Jain, Proprietor, M/S Cement House
S/o Late Rupchand Jain, H. S. Road, Dibrugarh Town, P.O., P.S.-Dibrugarh, Pin-786001, Dist.-Dibrugarh, Assam
2. M/S Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Guwahati Divisional Office, No. II Christianbasti, P.S.-Dispur, Pin-781005
Kamrup
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. R. Thakuria, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Hazarika,Advocate, for Mr. O. K. Shrestha, Advocate
 Ms. S. S. Choudhury, Advocate
Dated : 08 Aug 2016
Final Order / Judgement

       Heard Mr. R. Thakuria, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Hazarka and Ms. S.S. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the resident Nos. 1 and 2 respectively.

         This is an application for condoning the delay of six days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. Also perused the objection petition submitted by the respondent No. 1 against the application for condonation of delay. The grounds of delay have been explained at paragraphs 4 to 9. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the accompanying appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraphs 4 to 9 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

         Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.