Sri Asesh Kumar Roy. V/S Multiple Concrete Private Ltd.
Multiple Concrete Private Ltd. filed a consumer case on 26 Mar 2010 against Sri Asesh Kumar Roy. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RC/113/2009 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
West Bengal
StateCommission
RC/113/2009
Multiple Concrete Private Ltd. - Complainant(s)
Versus
Sri Asesh Kumar Roy. - Opp.Party(s)
Monali Biswas. Mr. Sajal Biswas.
26 Mar 2010
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
RC No. 113 of 2009
1. Multiple Concrete Private Ltd.A Private Ltd. Company, 13, DumDum Road, (K.L. Ghosh Super Market) PS. Dum Dum, Kolkata- 700074. Dist. North 24-Parganas.
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. Sri Asesh Kumar Roy.S/O Late Paresh Chandra Roy, Flat No. 304, Santosh Apartment, 245/1, Dum Dum Road. Kolkata- 700074, Presently residing at Flat No. 4A, 4th floor, Block-1, Uttarayan, 40, Dum Dum road. Kolkata-700074.2. Sri Brij Gopal Benani.S/O Late Sri Gopal Benani, 11, Sova Ram Basak Street, Kolkata- 700007.3. Sri Ram Gopal Benani.S/O Late Sri Gopal Benani. 11, Sova Ram Basak Street, Kolkata-700007.4. Sri Ghanoshyam Das Benani.S/O Late Sri Gopal Benani, 11, Sova Ram Basak Street, Kolkata- 700007.
...........Respondent(s)
For the Appellant :
Monali Biswas. Mr. Sajal Biswas. , Advocate for
For the Respondent :
Mr. Bibhas Mondal. Mr. Tarunjyoti Bandyopadhyay. Mr. Avijit Sarkar. , Advocate
Dated : 26 Mar 2010
ORDER
No. 8/26.03.2010.
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT.
Revision Petitioner through Mr. Sajal Biswas, the Ld. Advocate and O.P. No. 1 through Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, the Ld. Advocate are present.After hearing the Ld. Advocate for the Revisionist – Developer and Respondent No. 1 Complainant we find that the owner Respondents though have been served but have not entered appearance.The Ld. Advocate for the Revisionist – Developer states that his client is agreeable to execute and register the Deed of Conveyance in favour of the Complainant – Respondent No. 1 on the basis of the Deed of Conveyance finalized and agreed to by and between the Complainant and the Developer – O.P. No. 1 and the execution and registration of the Deed has not been possible yet only because non-co-operation of the other O.Ps who are the owners of the property.As in respect of Deed of Conveyance the same has been finalized between the Complainant and the O.P. No. 1 – Developer and no objection has been raised by other O.Ps, the dispute relating to drafting and finalizing the Deed of Conveyance has since been settled.Therefore, the impugned order need not stand any further.We have been told that the present Deed of Conveyance has been prepared by Sri Arun Kr. Bhaumik, the Ld. Advocate who was named in the Agreement as responsible for preparation of the Deed.The Ld. Advocate for the Complainant on instruction of the Complainant who is present before us agreed to the said Deed of Conveyance as has been modified on his suggestion.Therefore, the revision is allowed.The impugned order is set aside and the Forum is directed to complete the formalities in accordance with law for registration of the Deed on the basis of accepted copy of the Deed of Conveyance.As it appears that the owners of the property who are other O.Ps are not co-operating and not even appearing either before us or before the Forum, the registration may be completed by the Forum in accordance with law exercising its power.The Revision is thus disposed of as allowed.
The copy of the order be sent down to the Forum forthwith.
MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, Member
HON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT
,
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.