Assam

StateCommission

MA/72/2016

Assam Power Distribution Company Limited - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sri Ananda Talukdar - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. K. D. Sarma

20 Jan 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/72/2016
In
First Appeal No. A/54/2016
 
1. Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Bijulee Bhawan, Paltan Bazar, Guwahati-1, Dist.-Kamrup(M), Assam
2. Executive Engineer, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
3. Sub-Divisional, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
4. Assistant Engineer, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
5. Sri C. Sarma A. E. (REV), MESD, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
6. Sri R. Kalita A. E (PP), MESD, Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
7. Sri J. P. Roy (J.M.), Assam Power Distribution Company Limited
Sub- Division Engineer Office, Mirza, Guwahati
Kamrup(M)
Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Sri Ananda Talukdar
S/o Late Nabin Talukdar R/o Village- Godebori, P.O., P.S.-Palasbari, Dist.-Kamrup(M), Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. K. D. Sarma, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. N. P. Baruah, Advocate
Dated : 20 Jan 2017
Final Order / Judgement

            Heard Mr. K.D. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N.P. Baruah, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent.

              This is an application for condoning the delay of 11 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraph 2 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraph 2 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

              Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.