THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
REVISION PETITION NO – 24/2017
ORDER DATED. 11/08/2017
PRESENT:-
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENT
SRI. V.V.JOSE : MEMBER
REVISION PETITIONER:
Canara Bank,
Rep. by its Senior Manager,
Kulappully, SME Branch,
Kulapully, Shoranur,
Ottapalam Taluk- 679 522.
(By Adv. G.S.Kalkura)
RESPONDENT:
Sreesankar,
S/o Unniyappan,
Chakkingalthodi,
Petitioner,
Vadanamkurissir. P.O,
Ottapalam Taluk- 679 121.
(2)
ORDER
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENT
Surety in a loan transaction with the Revision Petitioner bank after closing of the loan transaction approached the District Forum with a complaint over the non return of title deed tendered as security for loan.
After hearing both sides the District Forum allowed the complaint entering finding there was deficiency of service on the part of the bank in non-returning the title deed furnished as security. A time limit was fixed for return of security with direction to pay compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and cost of Rs. 3000/- . However in the order passed by the Forum while directing return of the document with an alternative clause over imposition of penalty on default, an error occurred in combining penalty with the cost ordered in the proceedings . Taking advantage of that the revision petitioner resisted the claim for compensation and cost ordered by the Forum. That objection was found having no merit by the
(3)
Forum. On the finding of the deficiency of service entered the bank was bound to pay penalty and cost. We do not find any merit in the revision filed challenging the order of the lower forum clarifying the order passed in the complainant that cost ordered in the proceedings is distinct and different from the penalty liable for default in non returning security.
Revision is dismissed.
JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENT
V.V.JOSE : MEMBER
Sh/-