Kerala

Kollam

CC/166/2016

R.J.Varghese, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sreeranjini, - Opp.Party(s)

31 May 2018

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/166/2016
( Date of Filing : 11 Jul 2016 )
 
1. R.J.Varghese,
Raju Bhavanam,Chemmakadu.P.O,Kollam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sreeranjini,
Junior Superintendent,Urban Affairs Directorate,Nanthancode,Kowdiar.P.O,Thiruvananthapuram.
2. F-3 Section Clerk,
Urban Affairs Directorate,Nanthancode,Kowdiar.P.O,Thiruvananthapuram.
3. Director ,
Urban Affairs Department,Nanthancode,Kowdiar.P.O,Thiruvananthapuram.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 31 May 2018
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLLAM

            DATED THIS THE 31St  DAY OF MAY 2018

 

Present: -    Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

Sri. M.Praveen Kumar,Bsc, LLB ,Member

 

       CC.No.166/2016

R.J.Varghese                                             :                  Complainant

Raju Bhavanam

Chemmakadu P.O

Kollam – 691603

V/S

          1.       Smt.Sreeranjini                      :                  Opposite parties

                   Junior Superintendent

                   Urban Affairs Directorate

                   Nanthancode

                   Kowdiar P.O

                   Thiruvananthapuram

                   [By Adv.S.K.Reghupalan & Renjith kumar, Kollam]

          2.       F-3 Section Clerk

                   Urban Affairs Directorate , Nanthancode

                   Kowdiar P.O

                   Thiruvananthapuram

          3.       Director

        Urban Affairs Department

       Nanthancode

                   Kowdiar P.O

                   Thiruvananthapuram

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

   Complainant and counsel for the complainant called absent today also inspite of specific direction to appear and face cross examination .                Opposite parties 1 to 3 represented.

 In the circumstances we are of the view that the complainant has no interest in proceeding with the case.

 In the result, complaint stands dismissed for default. No costs.

Dated this the 31st   day of  May  2018.

                                                                                   

                                                                                                E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-                                                                                                                                                                    M.PRAVEENKUMAR: Sd/-

                                                                                                Forwarded/by Order

                                                                                                Senior Superintendent 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.