Andhra Pradesh

Anantapur

CC/25/2015

G.Sreenivasa Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sravani Enterprises rep. by its Propreitor - Opp.Party(s)

N.P.Sreenivasulu

10 Jul 2015

ORDER

District Counsumer Forum
District Court Complax
Anantapur
 
Complaint Case No. CC/25/2015
 
1. G.Sreenivasa Reddy
S/o G Obi Reddy Itikalapalli Village Ananthapuramu Rural Mandal
Ananthapuramu
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sravani Enterprises rep. by its Propreitor
Near APSRTC Bus Stand Road, Ananthapuramu
Ananthapuramu
Andhra Pradesh
2. Pahuja Seeds rep. by its Director
A3 Panchavati Opposite New Subzi Mandi Azadpur Delhi
Delhi
Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. Y.H.Prameela Reddy PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE S.Sri Latha Member
 
For the Complainant:N.P.Sreenivasulu, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: P.Guru Prasad OP1, Advocate
 S.Narendra Reddy, Advocate
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM :: ANANTAPURAMU.

 

PRESENT:- Kum. Y.H.Prameela Reddy, M.A., LL.B., President,

Smt. M.Sreelatha, B.A., B.L., Lady Member

 

Friday, the 10th day of July, 2015.

 

C.C.NO. 25 / 2015

 

Between:

 

G.Sreenivasa Reddy, S/o G.Obireddy,

Itikalapalli (V), Anantapuramu Rural (M) & District.                           … Complainant

 

 Vs.

 

  1. Sravani Enterprises, Rep. by its Proprietor,

Near A.P.S.R.T.C. Bus-stand Road,

Anantapuramu.

 

  1. Pahuja Seeds, Rep. by its Director,

A-3, Panchavati, Opp: New Subzi Mandi,

Azadpur, Delhi – 110 033 (India).                                             … Opposite Parties

 

 

This case is coming on this day for hearing before us in the presence of Sri N.P.Sreenivasulu, Advocate for the Complainant and Sri P.Guru Prasad, Advocate for the Opposite Party No.1 and Sri S.K.Narendra Reddy, Advocate for Opposite Party No.2 and after perusing the material papers on record, the Forum delivered the following:

 

:: DOCKET ORDER ::

 

Date: 10.07.2015:

        

Counsel for complainant filed a memo stating that since the matter is settled out of Forum and requested to dismiss the complaint on that ground.

Notice also given to other side.  The said memo is recorded.

Counsel for complainant and O.Ps., both endorsed on the complaint to that extent.

Hence, the C.C. is dismissed as settled out of Forum, but no costs in the circumstances.

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                               Sd/-

               LADY MEMBER                                                                        PRESIDENT,

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,                                              DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,

            ANANTAPURAMU.                                                                  ANANTAPURAMU.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Y.H.Prameela Reddy]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE S.Sri Latha]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.