Orissa

Rayagada

CC/106/2018

K.Srinivas - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sr. Superintendent of Post Office - Opp.Party(s)

Self

10 Dec 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 106/ 2018.                                 Date.  10      .     12  . 2018

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                          President.

Sri  Gadadhara  Sahu,                                           Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Sri  K.Srinivas Rao, S/O: K.Bhujanga Rao,  AT:Kasturinagar, 2nd. Lane, Po/Dist: Rayagada, State:Odisha, PinNo.  765  001, Cell No.94371-62120.

                                                                                                …  Complainant.

Versus.

1.The  Sr.  Superintendent   of Post offices,   At/Po:Jeypore, Dist:Koraput,

State:Odisha, Pin No.764001.                                       ..Opposite party.

 

                                                            JUDGEMENT

The  curx of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for non payment of the mail conveyance charges amounting to Rs.20,614.00  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

                The  O.P  appeared in person  before the forum  and  filed written version   refuting the allegations of the complainant and made arguments touching the points both on facts as well as law.

                Further the O.P.  has  credited the amount a sum of Rs.20,614.00 in the bank account of the complainant on Dt. 13.10.2018 (copies of the payment order is in the file which is marked as Annexure-I). 

                The complainant in person  present before the forum and  submitted   a memo to withdraw the case since the complainant has already received the  claimed outstanding amount from the O.P and   he has  no more claim against the O.P   in connection with the aforesaid case.

            Heard.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the complainant.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after receiving the outstanding amount  from the O.P.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this        10 th      .   Day of       December, 2018.

               

                 Member.                                                            Member.                                      President

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.