Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/95/2020

Anoop M R - Complainant(s)

Versus

Southpark motors (P)ltd - Opp.Party(s)

03 Sep 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/95/2020
( Date of Filing : 18 Mar 2020 )
 
1. Anoop M R
Manoharam,27/1240-3,Vanchiyoor,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Southpark motors (P)ltd
near Indian oil pertorl pump,Vazhayilla,peroorkada,Trivandrum
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 95/2020 Filed on 18/03/2020

ORDER DATED: 03/09/2022

 

Complainant

:

Anoop.M.R., S/o.Manoharan, Kukku Nivas, Ayirooppara.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram -84.

                 (By Adv.V.S.Balasubramaniam)

Opposite parties

:

  1. M/s. Sounthpark Motors Pvt. Ltd., Near Indian Oil Petrol Pump, Vazhayila, Peroorkada, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 005.
  2. S.Mohandas, Managing Director, M/s. Sounthpark Motors Pvt. Ltd., Near Indian Oil Petrol Pump, Vazhayila, Peroorkada, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 005.

(By Adv.Prabhu Vijayakumar)

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties.  Though the opposite parties entered appearance through counsel, no written version was filed.  When the case came up for consideration today, both were represented and submitted that the matter is settled.  The complainant’s wife who is also the power of attorney holder of the complainant was present and acknowledged the receipt of the settlement amount.  The opposite parties counsel also filed a memo to that effect.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled. 

In the result complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will be no order as to cost.      

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 03rd day of September,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.