NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2011/2009

ANJALI SURENDRA SARDAR, THROUGH HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER-PRABHATKUMAR RAMCHANDRA SALAVI - Complainant(s)

Versus

SOU. KANCHAN NIVRUTTI CHAVAN-PATIL & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. O.B. BHADULE

12 Sep 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2011 OF 2009
 
(Against the Order dated 31/01/2009 in Appeal No. 1571/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. ANJALI SURENDRA SARDAR, THROUGH HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER-PRABHATKUMAR RAMCHANDRA SALAVI
R/o. Flat No. A-W-4 Kalpataru Housing Society Miraj Road. Sangli Through Her Power Of Attorney holder Prabhatkumar Ramchandra Salavi Age 86, Yrs Occ. Retired R/o. As aboce
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SOU. KANCHAN NIVRUTTI CHAVAN-PATIL & ORS.
Both R/o. Shri Sadguru Bunglow samrudhinagar Near Laxmi Temple Kupwad Road. Vishrambag Sangli
2. Shri Nivrutti yashwant Chavan-Patil
R/o Shri Sadguru banglow, Samrudhinagar, Near Laxmi Temple, Kupwad Road, Vishrambag, Sangli
3. Kalpataru Co-operative Housing Society
Opp. Govt. Guest House, Vishrambag, Sangli
4. Shri Anil Shantilal Bafna
R/o Opp. Govt. Guest House, Vishrambag, Sangli
5. Shri Manjit Ramsingh Bhatiya
R/o. Sangli Indore Road Lines, Vishrambag, Sangli
6. Shri Suresh Prataprao Rochlani
R/o Osian Electrical, Harbhat Road, Sangli
7. Shri Madhukar Shankar Koshti
R/o Near Willington college, Vishrambag, Sangli
8. BALASAHEB MADHUKAR PATIL
1536, Shakuntala, Ganeshnagar
Sangli
9. ANUJ SONI
Advocate, Chamber No. 12, Civil Supplies Building, Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi-54
10. V.C. PATIL
Advocate, Shop No. 4, Anusaya Complex, 60/35, Bhavani Peth, Near Kasturga Market
Solapur-413002
11. HEMRAJ R. YADAV
'Ram-Prabha" Shantiban Colony, Dhamni Road
SANGLI-416415
Maharashta
12. HEMRAJ R. YADAV
'Ram-Prabha" Shantiban Colony, Dhamni Road
SANGLI-416415
Maharashta
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SURESH CHANDRA, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
NEMO
For the Respondent :
For the Respondents no.1&2 : Mr. Madhav Tamhankar,
Advocate
For Respondent no.3 to 7 : Nemo

Dated : 12 Sep 2011
ORDER

The matter was passed over. On the second call also none is present on behalf of the petitioner. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to seek instruction as to whether petitioner wants to pursue with the matter or not. Neither Petitioner nor his counsel is present today. In these circumstances, as there is no one present on behalf of the petitioner, both the revision petitions are dismissed in default.

 
......................J
V. B. GUPTA
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
SURESH CHANDRA
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.